PDA

View Full Version : Severn River Commission Meeting Report



goose70
06-08-2007, 09:40 AM
The Severn River Commission (not to be confused with the Severn River Association, which is a private group -- the Commission is a government advisory body made up of nine Commissioners who the County executive appoints to three-year terms) met last evening. Its meetings (4pm-6:30pm, first Thurs of each month, except no July meeting) are open to the public -- esp. the SRRKC! They're held at the Heritage Complex, Riva Rd, 2664 building.

Anyhooo, at this past meeting we heard from Mary Searing, the County's Watershed & Ecosystem Services Program Manager. She gave a presentation on the County's watershed management tool, which is a state-of-the-art computer modeling program that contains every stream (regardless of size), nook and cranny in the County, including identifying and categorizing every piece of forest, impervious surface, residential and agricultural land. The current County Exec. has ordered the Dept. of Public Works to aggressively move forward, using this tool, to develop a new general development plan for the Severn watershed that prevents the 93% reduction in forest throughout the watershed that current zoning would allow. The model can also be used to assess, in detail, the various harms to streams and the Severn that various new development proposals would cause. I doubt that many watersheds in the world are fortunate enough to have such a complex modeling system, and we now appear to have an administration that wants to use it to guide land-use planning.

Here are some interesting stats from the program: Currently, the makeup of the Severn watershed, which includes the area around Whitehall Bay and extends out to Odenton, is as follows: 20% impervious surface (concrete, asphalt, buildings); 38% undeveloped forest; 6% undeveloped, non-agricultural fields/bogs; 3% agricultural fields; 41% residential (I think that this includes soccer/baseball fields). Of the homes in AA County, 26% are on public sewer; 21% on septic but slated by the County to be switched to public sewer; and 52% are on septic and slated to remain that way for the foreseeable future. That's a problem, because septic systems, especially those near the water, leach nitrogen and other bad stuff into the water. The good news is that, to the extent money allows, the County is trying to switch homes near the water to public sewer first.

Mary also noted that, if one plugs into the model various levels of sharp cutbacks in residential lawn fertilizer use, the positive results on water quality tend to be significant. Conversely, if lawn fertilizer use continues as is, then even the hundreds of millions of tax dollars that the County plans to spend on stream restoration, purchasing development rights, stormwater and sewage upgrades, will still not achieve water quality goals for the Severn or anywhere else. That's some food for thought for you.

J.P. Williams
06-08-2007, 06:12 PM
Great report, Jeff. Thanks for keeping us posted.

20% impervious? That's scary, esp. for baby yellow perch. But the projection tools might have great value for fine-tuning our strategies to help the river.

lfreed
06-09-2007, 02:23 PM
Wow... excellent report, Jeff. Sorry these meetings fall on the first thursday of the month (It seems like something else falls at that time, but I can seem to remember right now :)) ).

As always - very interesting information...

D A Kahler
06-12-2007, 08:34 AM
Jeff,

I recall there was some talk of sending out mailers to the residents on the Severn in attempt to educate them of the dangers of runoff. Perhaps we can use this "brown algae" as the real life example to convince them there is a problem. Surely no one likes the brown stains on their boats, clothing, etc and most will be able to relate. It's well documented that high levels of organic nitrogen contribute to these algae blooms. Just a thought.

Dave

goose70
06-12-2007, 08:44 AM
Dave, I',m still working on that. It's been frustrating. The private Severn River Association received a grant from the Chesapeake Trust to send out those kind of mailings. Unfortunately, for whatever reason, the crucial issue of lawn fertilizer runoff was not included in any of the mailings.....they were more about joining the SRA, which has me a bit disappointed. County Exec Leopold's community liason offered at the last SRC meeting to distribute information to community associations, so that may be the best route. At this point, however, I think we'll get our best bang for the buck if we send something like this out next March, since that's when people think about applying fertilizer. It's too late this year, I'm afraid.

D A Kahler
06-12-2007, 08:50 AM
Jeff,

That's too bad. Thanks for putting in the effort, hopefully it will pay off in the future. Is there any way we can help here on the board?

A story in a local paper about the brown tide could go a long way as well.