PDA

View Full Version : VAs Federal Angler Registry



GScott
03-29-2009, 09:04 AM
I have not read of this here, perhaps I missed it.
I received the infomation below from a VA captain and I found it very interesting.
It's a long read but it's worth it. You will be effected. It seems the State boat license will be obsolete since boats will need to be boarded to check the Federal Registry number of everyone on board.
I'm curious as to how you guys feel about this.

GScott

"1. Angler Federal Registry- Since the federal proposed rule for salt water angler registration was released, VMRC is seriously looking at ways Virginia can meet the federal requirements. Due to years of complaints about survey results, the feds want to develop and use a data base of registered anglers to reference when conducting surveys. Therefore, a national registry of salt water angers has been mandated. Anglers can either register with the federal government, which will be free in 2010, but cost $15-25 per year beginning in 2011; or Virginia can collect the data needed by the feds through state licensing and/or registration programs and “exempt” Virginia anglers from direct federal registration and the associated federal fee. The new federal rule specifically excludes blanket boat licenses and requires individual registration. It also prohibits exemptions for blanket licenses on public piers and exemptions for fishing from private lands, which we have here in Virginia.
These requirements leave Virginia three basic options. We have listed the options below that VMRC has identified to meet the federal angler registration requirements.
Option 1
Do nothing at the state level and let their anglers comply with the federal rule by registering directly with the feds.
CCA Virginia Analysis for Option 1:
This option is easiest for the state government and costs the state government nothing. However, it will cost every Virginia salt water angler $15-25 per year beginning in 2011 and that money goes to the federal treasury for general use, not the state or even to federal fishery programs.
At $15-25 per registrant for the estimated 325,000 anglers; that is $4.8 million to $8.1 million Virginia citizens and visitors would have to pay in addition to the state individual or boat fishing license fees which currently costs saltwater anglers about $2.5 million.
Option 2
Modify the existing state saltwater fishing licensing program to meet the federal registration standards. This basically means licensing every angler from age 16 to 59 and somehow reporting name and contact information for those over 59 within 2 years of starting the registration program.
CCA Virginia Analysis for Option 2:
This has an advantage to the state of allowing any license fees accrue to the state, but makes a lot of people get licenses that did not previously require them. In Virginia, that means any person fishing on a private boat whose owner buys the boat license. The boat license would have to be eliminated under this option. Many more licenses would be sold, possibly resulting in more Wallop-Breaux grant money for Virginia and certainly more money for the Virginia Recreational Fishing Development Fund.
Using the estimate of 325,000 saltwater anglers and an individual license price of $12.50 (less $1 for dealer fees), this option could generate $3.7 million for the dedicated recreational fund each year, compared to $2.5 million generated by the current licensing program. That would provide $3.7 million for VA Saltwater Fishing Tournament, Virginia Tagging Program, ramps, reefs, piers, education, outreach, research and other programs beneficial to Virginia’s salt water anglers.
Option 2A
This option is much the same as option 2 with an adjustment to the individual license price that makes the change “revenue neutral” or at least less expensive. The “weekend pass” could be combined with this option to make cost for infrequent guests even lower.
CCA Virginia Analysis for Option 2A:
A license price of $8 would generate about the same revenue as the current licensing program if there are 325,000 individual licenses sold. The weekend pass would be $2.00 a person that could easily be obtained over the internet or telephone. A temporary saltwater recreational fishing license, which shall be valid for a stated period of time not to exceed ten consecutive days at a cost of five dollars would still remain in effect.
Option 3
This option would create a hybrid system using individual licenses, boat licenses, and a free or low cost individual registration system at the state level. For Virginia, this would mean we could leave the existing licensing system unchanged and require unlicensed anglers (like those fishing on private boats) to register and carry their annual registration number with them when they fish.
CCA Virginia Analysis for Option 3:
While this hybrid system would allow the private boat license to remain intact, it would create two systems. The existing system would be used for collecting data about licensees and a second would have to be created for registrants. The registration system would have some costs. Similar programs already in place for hunters cost about 75 cents per registrant per year from one contractor. While it may be far less if the state does the processing in-house, it could still translate into hundreds of thousands of dollars in costs for Virginia. It is certain that any costs for registration system would come from the salt water license fund, not general funds. At 50 cents per registrant, it could cost us $200,000 based on 400,000 saltwater anglers.
The private boat licensing program has been popular with anglers because of the convenience of “automatically” licensing guests and because law enforcement does not have to board to check individual licenses. Regardless of the option selection, these benefits will disappear. Individual anglers will have to be licensed or registered, and the presence of a boat license will not satisfy registration for unlicensed guests. Unlicensed guests will have to register before fishing and law enforcement officers will have to check individuals for a fishing license or proof of angler registration. This could be a confusing system with serious compliance issues due to that confusion.
CCA Virginia believes there are some significant opportunities we can consider as Virginia reacts to this federal mandate. We could restructure our licensing program and generate more funds for angler supported projects. Creating a central angler registry that must be electronic and therefore legible, portable, and accessible will finally provide CCA Virginia and other angler advocates with the data needed to lobby effectively for angler issues.
And most important, we will finally provide the managers with some of the tools necessary to assure more rational and accurate assessments of angler effort and catch. This will hopefully create a better sense of fair treatment in the angling community.
During the discussion on this item, the GAO recommends that CCA VA take a position that we support Option 2A with the individual license cost at $10.00 and strike out the week-end pass option because there is already a option in the law for a 10 day temporary license for $5.00 . We need to get that recommendation approved by the Executive Committee. Also, we will take that position if approved to our quarterly meetings that we plan to set up with VMRC staff to discuss that position."

Bob Allen
03-29-2009, 04:50 PM
Gscott: that is a very good and comprehensive discussion of the options and impact of the Federal Angler registration program, which was supposed to be in effect in Jan 2009; but now has been moved to 2010...and who knows when it actually will be imposed.

VMRC has a great option proposed, which would be funded by the present license fees, but since the Governor has decided to use those recreational license fees to help him balance the State Budget, there was no reason for Travelstead to even introduce a bill into the legislature which would be paid for out of pre-existing (now non existant) recreational license money.

Too bad...the govrnor got his bailout money from the dedicated fisherman's fund = from the RFAB even before Obama found out that there is a bottomless pit , where exists plenty of your and my dollars.

Bob Allen VCAC PSWSFA Hampton VA

Tom Powers
03-29-2009, 08:23 PM
Senator Northam (D, Norfolk) introduced and got Senate Resolution 397 passed during the past legislative session. It directs VMRC to submit options to the legislature by November. It will give the Senate and House Committees the options on which to base legislation during the 2010 session. Below is the text of the resolution.

<center>Agreed to by the Senate, February 10, 2009</center> <center>Agreed to by the House of Delegates, February 20, 2009</center> <center> </center> WHEREAS, the United States Department of Commerce National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) adopted regulations to establish a national registry of saltwater recreational anglers fishing in the Exclusive Economic Zone and in state waters for anadromous species; and


WHEREAS, the registry requirement is intended to improve the efficiency of existing angler surveys, to reduce possible sources of bias, and to improve confidence in survey results among anglers and fishery managers; and


WHEREAS, the United States Secretary of Commerce may charge a fee currently estimated to be in the range of $15 to $25 per saltwater angler per year to register with the NMFS after January 1, 2011; and


WHEREAS, saltwater anglers will not be required to register annually with the NMFS if they are licensed by a state that provides data determined to be sufficient to meet the agency’s survey needs; now, therefore, be it


RESOLVED by the Senate, the House of Delegates concurring, That the Virginia Marine Resources Commission be requested to examine the creation of a comprehensive registry of saltwater anglers in the Commonwealth. The Virginia Marine Resources Commission (Commission) shall determine if changes must be made to the Commonwealth’s saltwater recreational fishing license program to conform to the National Angler Registry requirements.


In conducting its study, the Commission shall consider: (i) the types of licenses and license exemptions that should be eliminated;

(ii) the economic impacts to the Saltwater Recreational Fishing Development Fund from such licensing changes; and (iii) other means to achieve an exemption from the requirement that anglers in the Commonwealth register with the NMFS. The Commission shall complete its work prior to November 1, 2009.


The Commission shall submit to the Division of Legislative Automated Systems an executive summary and report of its progress in meeting the requests of this resolution no later than the first day of the 2010 Regular Session of the General Assembly. The executive summary and report shall be submitted for publication as a report document as provided in the procedures of the Division of Legislative Automated Systems for the processing of legislative documents and reports and shall be posted on the General Assembly’s website.

bobpride
03-31-2009, 07:53 AM
The CCA Alert posted above was a draft. The final version had a different conclusion in the last paragraph:

For these reasons, CCA Virginia supports option 2A with an individual fishing license priced at $8, the weekend pass option at $2, and a temporary license up to ten days at $5. Also keep any new revenues in Virginia's Saltwater Recreational Fishing Development Fund. We also prefer this option because it uses one system: registration and licensing are integrated into a single system and available from the same venue. Licensees would be automatically placed in the registration database, and not be also required to "register" as a separate transaction. This is essential for the ease of compliance, and the resultant rate of angler compliance.

CCA reached this conclusion and recommendations for several reasons:
1. One of the primary advantages of a boat license is the sticker that lets VMRC officers know the anglers are licensed. It is assumed to cause fewer boardings, event though it should not since fish need to be checked, too. With the registraitone requirement, this perceived benefit would go away because the marine police would need to check for individual angler registrations even if there was a boat license.
2. The money raised stays in Virginia and would be dedicated to artificial reefs and other projects to benefit anglers.
3. The "weekend pass", Friday through Sunday, for $2 would help mitigate the loss of the boat license by allowing a quick, inexpensive registration for visiting friends and relatives. An 800 number call from a cell phone could get the pass and a registration/license number to satisfy marine patrol checks. With current mobile technology, we could even equip the officers with Pocket PC's or Blackberrys to check the registrations real time.
4. This option involves only one system --- the Virginia fishing license system. Whether you get your license for a year or a weekend, buy it at Wal-Mart, Greentop, Bubba's, Bass Pro, on the internet, or over the phone, it would take care of licensing and the required federal registration. While we lose the boat license, we get the economy and convenience of one stop licensing and registration. Compliance with the federal requirement would be "automatic" and easy.

We also have asked the feds to include the HMS offshore permit (sometimes called the "tuna" permit) as a checkbox on the licensing/registration application. This checkbox would only apply to boat owners since the HMS permit is a vessel permit, not an individual permit.

Bob Pride

Zzzz
03-31-2009, 08:50 AM
pardon the language, but F%&K the federal government...it is long past time for a pitchfork party

beechtym
04-05-2009, 09:43 AM
WHy not keep the boat license and make the skipper or registered owner responsible for reporting survey info after each trip? A simple down-loadable form could be printed out and taken along for recording purposes, then the info could be transferred to an on-line form or mailed in. Seems to me its more about the money than the info. Bottom line; Do we want to put more money in the hands of a government, state or federal, that has shown a clear inability to manage it responsibly?