PDA

View Full Version : Good Information Review on Hobie Adventurer (with\without Sail)



Friday
07-08-2009, 09:50 AM
I finally had time to test Hobie Adventurer on the last Saturday.

I made three sections on this document. The first section describes the kayak I tested, The testing environment, and about the reviewer (me). The second section is the review on Hobie Adventurer without the sail. The third section is review on Hobie Adventurer with the sail.

Section 1 - Testing Kayak, Environment and Reviewer

The kayak


2008 Standard Hobie Adventurer. Standard fins and Turbo fins were used. The standard Hobie Adventurer comes with Rudder. No extra equipments such as fishing rods, milk crate, and cooler were on board.
The Environment:


Air Temp: 78F
Water temp: 79F
Wind: Inconsistent 0 – 12 MPH, mostly 8 – 10 MPH
Wave: less than 6 inches
Place: Smith Creek in MD. Long but Narrow Creek (a half mile across)

The Reviewer

Sex: male
Age: 55
Weight 145lb
Height (5’ 7”)
Fitness level: Above average. Jogs 3 miles and lifts weights every day.
Previous experience:
No previous Hobie Kayak experience.
More than 150 trips on various SOT kayaks:
Llakes and creeks (5 %)
Chesapeake Bay (65 %) – waves up to 2.5
Ocean (30%) – waves up to 3’
Limited Experience on sailing on Hobie Cat, windsurfing and small sail boats

Section 2 - Review on Hobie_Adventurer without sail

1. Degree of difficulty on Overturning a capsized Hobie Adventurer


I usually turn over a capsized SOT kayak by pushing the center handle and pulling a scupper hole (sticking my finger(s) into the scupper hole). But I did not pre-locate the scupper holes before the test. I was planning to use the mirage drive instead of a scupper hole.

When I tried the first time to turn over the kayak, immediately I recognized that the kayak was one of the difficult ones to turn over. It took me about 5-6 seconds. I could turn over the most of kayaks in 0.5 – 3 seconds. There is a big difference between two kayaks, one can be turned over in 3 seconds and the other requires more than 5 seconds to be turned over. The degree of difficulties of turning over a kayak is not proportional to the height of wave when the wave is high. It is more likely exponential to the height of wave. The most of SOT kayaks can be turned over before the next high wave hits the kayaks and the kayakers. But 5-6 seconds are too long. The next high wave can hit a Hobie Adventurer and the kayaker before the Hobie Adventurer is turned over. It may take several tries to turn over a Hobie Adventurer. I don’t think women and young kids can turn over a Hobie Adventurer. This kayak may be very hard to turn over for even a regular man when the kayak is used for fishing. Because I think the typical fishing kayak equipped with a lot of stuff (tethered fishing rods, tackle bag and cooler). If tackle bag and cooler (or milk crate) are bungeed on this kayak, it will be very difficult to turn over this kayak for a fisherman who is not adequately trained for self-rescue.

I also think that it will be difficult to turn over this kayak if wave is over 1.5 feet if a kayaker has not trained for the 1.5 foot wave. I think I will have hard time to turn over this kayak in 2-2.5 foot wave. I will definitely invest a good amount of time for the self-rescue training on this kayak.
2. Stability of Hobie Adventurer


The kayak was stable. But I don’t think it was super stable like other wide kayaks. I think I will be fine in 2 foot wave. But I am not sure I will be comfortable in 2.5 foot wave (averaged/mean) because there are a lot of 3-3.5 foot waves. I will probably not venture out when more than 2 foot wave is expected until I learn more about Hobie Adventurer

3. Degree of difficulty on Re-entering Hobie Adventurer


Re-entering Hobie Adventurer was easy. This kayak is one of the easiest ones to re-enter. When I re-entered from the side (center) and stern, I felt the kayak was stable. It took me less than two seconds to put my belly on the center of the kayak when I did side-center reentry. Even with my short arm, I could reach the molded carrying handle on the other side of gunwale and pull myself up on the kayak at once. It took me another 5 seconds to turn my self and sit. During the maneuver, I bear-hugged kayak as if I was in rough water. Remember that there was nothing (No fish-finder, rod holders, milk crate, cooler and tackle bags) on board or installed on this testing kayak. There was nothing on the kayak that could interfere with my re-entry. Though re-securing the loose seat (put two prongs underneath the seat to the two holes on the kayak sitting area) took me some time.
When I did stern reentry, it took me 1 second to put my belly on the kayak. It took me 2 seconds to put my body behind the seat before I tried to secure the loose seat (putting two prongs underneath the seat into two holes on the kayak). Again I acted as if I was in 3 foot wave. I bear-hugged the kayak during the maneuver.

I did not like that I had to secure the loose seat after capsized. But I think I can get used to this.
4. Weight of Hobie Adventurer


Yes, it is a heavy kayak. Even though it was supposed to be less than 70 lb, I felt it weighs over 70lb (without mirage drive fins). I could lift the kayak above my head. But I won’t be comfortable if I have to put this kayak on the roof rack of an SUV. I am too light for this kayak. I don’t have enough body weight to counter the weight of the kayak. I may not be able to lift this kayak above my head in a few years as I become older. I recommend a pick-up truck to haul this kayak unless a person is big and strong.

5. Speed of Hobie Adventurer


My old GPS unit never located satellites during the test. Therefore I could not measure the speed accurately. I used my gut-feeling to estimate the speeds, and it can be very off.

I pedaled for 15 minutes at 4.5-5 MPH. I was using the standard fins. I think I can maintain 4 MPH for 2-3 hours. I assumed that my top speed can be 5.5 MPH for 15 minutes by just pedaling. I came back to the dock to test the turbo fins.
For the next 5 minutes, I pedaled with the turbo fins. Somehow I could not tell the significant increase of speed. Perhaps I was little tired or the environment (wind and current) changed.
I pedaled and paddled together for the next 30 minutes. I did not have any trouble with pedaling while paddling. I was well-coordinated. The top speed could reached 6.5-7 MPH. I started breathing a little faster after 15 minutes. I think I maintained 6-6.5 MPH for 30 minutes without breathing hard or muscle burning at all.

Safely speaking, I think Hobie Adventurer is faster than a regular SOT kayak by 0.8 -1 MPH. Personally I think my speed on Hobie Adventure can be faster than a typical SOT by 2 MPH for up to 2 hours if I pedal and paddle at the same time on Hobie Adventurer.

Now I recognized that a kayaker can troll for Spanish Mackerel. The adequate trolling speed for Spanish Mackerel is 5.5 – 6.5 MPH. Until now, I did not understand a kayaker who mentioned that one of the methods to catch Spanish Mackerel was Trolling. He had a Hobie Adventurer I believe.

I want to know how Hobie Adventure performs against 1.5'-2.5' wave. Next time I will take Hobie Adventurer when the wave is expected 2' plus.
6. Who can use this kayak


The Hobie adventurer is not for a typical women or young teenage boy under15. I don’t think a typical woman and young teenage boy have enough strength to carry Hobie Adventurer. More importantly, I don't think they have adequate strength to turn over the capsized Hobie Adventurer. Even for some grown man, turning over the kayak can be a problem, especially in 1.5 feet plus wave.
I think this kayak is good for a healthy male weighs between 180 – 230lb with good open water experience only because of its weight and the degree of difficulties on turning over the kayak.

7. Fishing friendliness


It will be hard to install a fish-finder, rod holders in front of the kayaker. But there will be good creative ways to install these depending on the physique of a kayaker and fishing methods\needs of a kayaker.
If the sail will be carried, no equipment may be installed on gunwales, Especially during self-rescue. The sail will be secured on gunwales during the self-rescue.

Section 3 - Review as a kayak fisherman on Hobie_Adventurer with the Sail

I thought that Hobie Adventurer with sail could be very good idea for me. I thought I might be able to cover more water, troll heavier lures, and troll faster for Spanish Mackerel. So I had to try out to see if there are advantages and disadvantages, and also to see if advantages outweigh disadvantages.

1. Stability of Hobie Adventurer with Sail


First, as I expected, I noticed that Hobie Adventure was a kayak not a full pledged sail boat. But it performs as the manufacturer said. As recommended, it is good for wind under 10 MPH. Otherwise it will not be stable unless you get very used to sailing on this kayak. Also I thought that the sail would be almost useless when the wind blows under 6 MPH.

The wind was blowing at 8-10 MPH most of time during the test. But since I was in a small area, the directions and intensities of the winds changes rapidly (were not consistent). I did not have hard time sailing at all. But because of the inconsistent wind, I had to constantly adjust the angle of sail by letting out or pulling the rope (outhaul) that was attached to the clew (the trailing corner of a sail). I adjust the angle of rudder with left hand. So my two hands were not free most of time.

The kayak picked up good speed with downwind and crosswind as expected. And the kayak was stable with downwind. The main question I had was how well this kayak would tack upwind. I found that tacking was doable with this kayak. But it was slow (1 MPH) with wind at 10 MPH. I didn’t think I can troll for Striped Bass at this slow speed. As a kayak-fisherman, I would give up tacking. I thought I should just pedal and paddle toward the destination.

2. Degree of difficulty on Turning Over a Capsized Hobie Adventurer with Sail


With the sail mounted, it will be impossible to turnover the capsized Hobie kayak. The kayak will be floating upside down if the water is deep enough. If the bottom is soft (mud) and the depth of water is less than 10 ft, the mast will be stuck on the bottom. Here are the self-rescue steps I followed for Hobie Adventure with the sail:


1) Attach the rope (outhaul) to the kayak. You may attach the rope to stern or in front of you. Use a bowline knot of snap hook for easy removal if necessary. The rope (outhaul) is also a tether line to the sail.
2) Wear a PFD. Don’t just carry it on the kayak. You need additional buoyancy to work with the mast and sail when capsized.
3) The kayak will be floating upside down if the water is deep enough.
4) Feel and find the bungee cord that secures the mast. Remove the bungee cord.
5) Pull out the mast from the mast hole on the kayak. If the mast is stuck on the bottom, you need to lift the kayak to pull the mast out of the mast hole on the kayak. This will be too hard for a woman and young teenage boy.
6) Roll the sail around the mast very tightly. If the sail sheet is not rolled or the sail sheet is loosely rolled around the mast, it will be very hard to move the mast and the sail under the water.
7) Attach the rolled sail to the kayak by using the bungee cord for the paddle. The kayak is still upside down at this point.
8) Secure the kayak paddle to the kayak by using the bungee.
9) Turn over the capsized kayak
10) Check all tether lines. Untangle tether lines if necessary, especially the rope (outhaul) to the kayak. You may have to detach and re-attach the rope (outhaul) to untangle.
11) Perform re-entry.
12) Put the mast back into the mast hole. Bungee the mast to secure
13) Pull the rope (outhaul) to open the sail sheet.

This whole maneuver will take 5-10 minutes depending on the skill level and environments.
Depending on the situation, you may change the sequence of steps 4- 8. But have enough self rescue drills so that you can follow your sequence without thinking.

3. Speed with cross wind and down wind


The speed was good and kayak is stable.
4. Sailing with upwind


Doable but Slow. Not for trolling
5. Conclusions


Hobie kayak with sail may not be OK to typical woman or young teenage boy if the person is alone without help. I don’t think they have enough strength for self-rescue.

The trolling area is determined by the locations of fish usually. But when trolling while sailing, I think the speed and direction of wind determine the trolling area. Though with aids of pedaling and paddling, and with more experience on sailing on this kayak, Hobie Adventure with sail can open up a new world of kayak fishing. I am an optimist and a dreamer according to my wife.

Hobie with sail is Not OK to the following kayak-fisherman:


Who is not fit. It can take very long time for self-rescue on a kayak with sail.
Who does not like getting wet. Capsizing will be a part of fishing
Who can not make re-entry to Hobie Adventurer without the sail within 30 seconds
Who carries too many stuff.
Who fishes in a small area.
Who fishes only in calm water wind less than 8 MPH
Who fishes in the cold water. Cold water below 60F must be avoided even with the full dry-suit on.

Hobie with sail is OK to the following kayak-fisherman:


Who is fit.
Who carries one rod and few lures
Who has sufficient self-rescue skill
Who wants to troll
Who travels long distance.
Who is patient and calm


Feel free to make comments, especially those who own Mirage Hobie.

Thanks,
Joe

surfnsam
07-09-2009, 01:56 PM
very nice report Joe. as for the Hobie thanks but no thanks

cirwin
07-09-2009, 03:26 PM
Nice review thanks. I have owned the Mirage Outback SUV for 5 years. Original hull was replaced with new one two years ago under warranty. New one is more stable. I absolutely love the pedal drive system, it is easier to troll and vary speeds. You have your hands free to fish which not only great, but you can hold in a current with minimal effort to stay on fish. I find it safer to fish where there is boat traffic. Also its very easy to turn if a fish makes a long run, especially if you want to fight on ultra light tackle. Not only spanish but trolling for trout is a blast and very effective, as I can fish two rods at once and have multiple hook ups. The turbo fins feel more stealthy than having to break water with a paddle and spook fish. I find it easier to pedal than paddle over long distances, but I also have more lower body strength than upper which someone in the market may want to consider. The only downside to pedal drive is you have to break out the paddle to reverse. I feel hobie's plastic feels more durable than other manufacturers which is why they are heavier. It has been an awesome fishing tool.

FishingRod
07-09-2009, 05:17 PM
7. Fishing friendliness

It will be hard to install a fish-finder, rod holders in front of the kayaker. But there will be good creative ways to install these depending on the physique of a kayaker and fishing methods\needs of a kayaker.


Below are a few pics on how I installed my fish finder, GPS and rod holders on my Hobie Adventure. I only used 2 screws for the fish finder base, the third hole of the base is hanging over the side. It is secure with two lock nuts. I was able to use nylon lock nuts and washers for the rod holder base (only 3 screws for the round base), the GPS base on the left side and the fish finder base on the right side. It is very tight inside the yak in those locations. A Craftsman offset ratchet wrench and THE SMALLEST SCREWS POSSIBLE IN LENGTH make this job a little easier. I had to use Wellnuts for the rod holder base on the right side. Wellnuts come in 2 differents sizes from KFS, I used the smaller ones. Just an fyi, I now use a Eagle Cuda 250 GPS/FF combo (uses same mount and transducer) which I like. No need to charge separate GPS unit batteries and mount separate GPS on the kayak.
http://www.marylandkayakfishing.com/pics/RiggedHobieAdventure/01.JPG
http://www.marylandkayakfishing.com/pics/RiggedHobieAdventure/02.JPG
http://www.marylandkayakfishing.com/pics/RiggedHobieAdventure/09.JPG
http://www.marylandkayakfishing.com/pics/RiggedHobieAdventure/10.JPG
http://www.marylandkayakfishing.com/pics/RiggedHobieAdventure/11.JPG
http://www.marylandkayakfishing.com/pics/Hobie/Hobie01.JPG
http://www.marylandkayakfishing.com/pics/Hobie/Hobie03.jpg

hale33
07-09-2009, 06:29 PM
Below are a few pics on how I installed my fish finder, GPS and rod holders on my Hobie Adventure. I only used 2 screws for the fish finder base, the third hole of the base is hanging over the side. It is secure with two lock nuts. I was able to use nylon lock nuts and washers for the rod holder base (only 3 screws for the round base), the GPS base on the left side and the fish finder base on the right side. It is very tight inside the yak in those locations. A Craftsman offset ratchet wrench and THE SMALLEST SCREWS POSSIBLE IN LENGTH make this job a little easier. I had to use Wellnuts for the rod holder base on the right side. Wellnuts come in 2 differents sizes from KFS, I used the smaller ones. Just an fyi, I now use a Eagle Cuda 250 GPS/FF combo (uses same mount and transducer) which I like. No need to charge separate GPS unit batteries and mount separate GPS on the kayak.

Hey FishingRod that's a Sweet Rig...Very Nice... Love both my Hobies (Adventure and Outback)... used to fish out of a Ocean Yak, fun but....hands free fishing is the best

Friday
07-09-2009, 08:08 PM
Thanks for pictures of rigs. That helps me a lot.
I am working on my wife to buy either Adventurer or Outback. I checked used ones but I could not find one.

Hale, FishingRod, and Bill

One of the people, I am going to fish with, weighs 265 lb (6'3"). Others weigh 215-220 lb. He is not available for a while before I buy one. I am leaning with Outback because of his weight. Do you guys think Adventurer is OK to him. Because I am going to jump on the first available used Hobie.

Joe

FishingRod
07-09-2009, 09:02 PM
Hale33, thanks! I also used to own an Ocean Kayak Prowler 15 and a Tarpon 140 but have to agree the Hobie Adventure is the best because of the hands free fishing and I can go a lot further without getting tired.

I actually used to own 2 Adventures so I could bring a friend along. But decided to sell one of them and bought a fiberglass canoe and use the canoe now when I invite a friend to go fishing. With the canoe I'm limited on what waters I can fish but it's nice to only have to load\unload one boat.

Friday, I would go with the Adventure if you can find a used one. The Adventure is faster and probably paddles better than the Outback, which is nice if for some reason you pulled a muscle, developed a knee problem or flipper malfunction (which is rare) on the water. Browse the Sell/Buy/Trade forum on kayakfishingstuff.com daily. I would also make a post on that forum saying you are looking for one. Someone may contact you before posting their ad. The Adventure's capacity is 350lbs. As long as your friend does not bring laundry basket loaded with junk like me:D then he should be okay.

Friday
07-10-2009, 06:30 AM
Thanks FishingRod.
It sounds like 350lb rating on Adventurer is true 350 lb. The reason I use word "true" is that I felt some kayaks rated 350lb should have been rated 300lb or 325lb. Some are rated 400lb but I think they are 350lb. I don't know how manufacturers come up with the capacity rating. The adventurer was very stable when I did few side re-entries. That time I thought it was more than 350lb comparing with other kayaks.

I will go with Adventurer unless I get a real bargain deal on Outback. After all I am the one who use the kayak 95% of time.

About the laundry basket:
My wife sneaked up on me when I was reading your reply with pictures last night. She was curious what I was going to buy next. I got caught but it wasn’t bad. Now I don’t have to explain why I need a new kayak and electronics, and why I have so many fishing rods.

She said “Oh my god! Isn’t this a laundry basket? How many fishing rods does he bring? Wow he is a high-tech homeless on the water. Does he carry a portable grill too?

Thanks for the pictures
Joe

FishingRod
07-10-2009, 09:42 AM
About the laundry basket:
My wife sneaked up on me when I was reading your reply with pictures last night. She was curious what I was going to buy next. I got caught but it wasn’t bad. Now I don’t have to explain why I need a new kayak and electronics, and why I have so many fishing rods.

She said “Oh my god! Isn’t this a laundry basket? How many fishing rods does he bring? Wow he is a high-tech homeless on the water. Does he carry a portable grill too?

Thanks for the pictures
Joe

:D:D:D:D
I probably could mount a portable grill in one of the Ram rod tubes.:chef:

I usually don't carry 4 rods. Most of the time I only take 2 rods. That day I was fishing in a tournament. So I was going for stripers and perch and wanted to have multiple rods locked and loaded with multiple lures. Seems like I catch less fish when I carry 4 rods because I am contantantly switching rods rather than focusing on working 1 lure.

You may also want to post your question about the Adventure weight capacity on the Hobie forum on KFS.

Hobie Kayaks - Kayakfishingstuff.com Community Forums (http://www.kayakfishingstuff.com/community/forumdisplay.php?f=90)

And the Hobie forum at

Hobie Cat Forums • Index page (http://www.hobiecat.com/community/)

Good luck with your search!

ictalurus
07-10-2009, 10:25 AM
Hey Joe,

The new Outback has a different hull shape than the one I have (mine is rounded with a wide, rounded keel, the new one is flatter with a narrower, pointier keel), so I can't say anything for sure about how it behaves with a 265lb guy onboard. When I first started kayaking, I was about 220lb and had no problems with it whatsoever. My father was 230-240lbs and also had no problems, but he fishes reservoirs primarily. I've also had the hull pretty full of water (~10 gallons, give or take, I could barely move it on land) from a leak a couple of times, and it didn't feel tippy. It just felt slow and bogged down. I couldn't figure out why I was moving so slow until I got back to the launch and tried to pull the boat out of the water. So there was definitely more than 265lbs on board on those occasions.

I will say that both he and I have fallen out of the Outback (mine was intentional), and the Outbacks stayed upright. If it does turn over, flipping it back would be tough because of the way the gunwales are shaped, but I can use my anchor trolley to grip and flip it back over. If I was really worried about turning it rightside up again, I would attach a floating line to the fixed, plastic side handle, which I think is on the starboard side. In the water, I would flip the line over the overturned hull, get on the port side, and pull on the rope while pushing the port side down to get the boat to flip over. I was thinking of using this system for when my wife kayaks with me. I would also put a loop in the rope that she could use as a ladder for re-entry. However, I'm pretty certain I would fall out of the Outback before it flipped over. During a side re-entry, I've had the hull sitting on its gunwale as I climbed in, and it return right side up when I let go to try climbing in again. This was in pretty calm water, though.

I bought my Outback before the Adventure came out, and I've never been in one. You might like the Revolution as a trade off between the Outback and Adventure. It's probably not as good at sailing, but it's pretty stable and quick. I didn't try a re-entry, though.

Regarding the seat pegs, mine don't come out that easily. I really shove them into the holes hard because it's a pain when they come out while you're pedaling. Just make sure to shove them in there really hard.

Friday
07-10-2009, 10:43 AM
Thanks Bill,

You save one of my Saturdays. I was planning to test out Outback but now I feel I don't really have to after reading your post. I guessed Outback can be tough to turn over. To me side entry has to be done very quickly before the kayak lean to one side. If you did it slowly and Outback was floating side not completely turned over means that boat is very stable boat. One day when we get together I want to try side entry and stern entry on your Outback. To me, side entry is moving kayaker to the top of the kayak. My stern entry is pulling the kayak and place the kayak under the kayaker. I can't explain very well. but May be my stern entry method will work for you well. I am free every Saturday, except July 18.

Fishing4Rods,

I checked the web site you suggested. I found the one post about big guy on the first page. Adventurer is good for a big guy at 265lb. They are saying weight capacities of Hobies were conservatively rated as I suspected when I tested.

Thanks for the help.

Friday
07-12-2009, 09:04 PM
Yesterday after fishing with surfnsam and Damselfish, I went to test Outback.

I already heard that Outback is slower than Adventurer but more stable than Adventurer. I also heard that Outback is hard to be turned over when capsized.

I pedaled and paddled an Outback for 30 minutes. Yes, Outback was slower than Adventurer by 1.5-2.0 MPH I thought. However, Outback was very stable. I could not make it capsized for two tries. I sat and held the handles with my hands on an Outback. I leaned to side to make the Outback capsized. But I could not do it. The Outback bounced back upright. So I leaned a bit more than first time. I could not do it again. All kayaks I was on, capsized when I leaned that much. So I leaned more than 45 degree and forced it capsized. I don’t think Outback will be capsized when I (145 lb) am on it in 3-4 foot wave. Even someone weighs more than 200lb will be very safe on Outback in 3-4 foot wave. I don’t think Outback will be capsized.

I tried to turnover the capsized Outback. I could not do it by using anything I can see above the water. There was no easy way to turnover the capsized Outback. So I had to try the last method (the sure thing) which I prefer not to do. This last method always worked. I grabbed the handle on a gunwale with one hand (left). I hold my breath and dove (put my head under the Outback)under the Outback and grabbed the handle on the other side with the other hand (right). I rotated the kayak by pulling one side (with right hand) toward my waist and pushing up (lifting with my left hand) the other side upward and toward right. The capsized Outback was turned over. Total time elapsed for this maneuver was 5 seconds. I just don’t want to do this maneuver in cold water, and especially when there are too many tether lines and fishing lines in the water. However this was the only maneuver I could think of that time.

Luckily, for tall people, on Outback, the rigid center handles are located inside of the gunwales. I think anyone over 6’ tall (with long arms) can reach the handle on the other side while the head is still above the surface. Tall person may not have to put his head under the Outback to reach the handle on the other side.

I was recommended to try out Revolution by people working in two different dealers. So I tested Revolution for 30 minutes. I pedaled and paddled. I crossed the wakes created by boats. Revolution was fast. Even though Adventurer was supposed to be the fastest, I thought Revolution was as fast as Adventurer and as stable as Adventurer. I liked Revolution a lot. Definitely, Revolution is more maneuverable than Adventurer. Also it was a little easier to handle it outside the water. Revolution can be more suitable for smaller people than Adventurer. Personnally I can find the room for Revolution in my garage but it is still hard to find the room for Adventurer. The guest users of my future Hobie, weigh between 100 and 220 lb except one guy at 265lb.
Considering portability and majority of users, I am leaning toward Revolution. But I will jump on the first used Hobie I can find.

Joe

ictalurus
07-13-2009, 08:17 AM
Hey Joe,

Did you try the side and stern re-entry on the Outback?

There are some Hobies for sale on the Washington DC Craigslist.

Friday
07-13-2009, 09:57 AM
Hey Joe,

Did you try the side and stern re-entry on the Outback?

There are some Hobies for sale on the Washington DC Craigslist.

Yes, Bill. I did try both, side and stern re-entries. That was the main reasons I went Backyard Boat in /Annapolis.

Outback was the easiest kayak for re-entry. The freeboard of Outback is bigger (higher) than any other kayaks I had tried. I could not reach the handle (on the other side) immediately. But Outback was so stable I didn't have to grab the handle. I could grab the strap of the seat and eventually I grabbed the handle. Then later when I got used to do it, I could grab the handle because the handle is inside of gunwale.

Bill,
I don't think you can capsize your Outback. If you ever do, you can grab the handle on the other side without putting your head under the kayak. You have long arms. Even I think I could grab it when I get used to this kayak. Once you grab the handles it is very easy to turn over the Outback.

Yes, I saw the AD and I am driving to see Revolution (for $1,100) during the launch hour. The Revolution is missing the seat.

Also, there is an unused 2007 Adventurer in Richmond, VA for $1,425. I just got his reply. On his email, he wrote that it's still in the packages. It comes with additional Turbo fins. I may see this this saturday.

I like both model.



Joe

hale33
07-13-2009, 05:01 PM
Just bought a Used 2007 Adventure for $900.00 in mint condition, last month.

Friday
07-13-2009, 08:02 PM
Hale,
That was excellent. Today I saw the Revolution. It was very bad. I didn't know UV can damage the kayak that bad if not kept in the shady area. I just have to keep looking.
Joe

hale33
07-13-2009, 08:36 PM
I can ask about the Revo demo from the same shop....it's like new... I've bought alot of stuff from the guy he might wanna unload it

Friday
07-13-2009, 08:54 PM
Hale,
Can you let me know if you found a good deal. I will drive to your area. As a matter of fact. Sam, Damselfish and I talked about fishing in remote area, such as your area. We were wondering if you would meet us and show your area one day.

Thanks,
Joe

Friday
07-19-2009, 08:09 PM
Below are a few pics on how I installed my fish finder, GPS and rod holders on my Hobie Adventure. I only used 2 screws for the fish finder base, the third hole of the base is hanging over the side. It is secure with two lock nuts. I was able to use nylon lock nuts and washers for the rod holder base (only 3 screws for the round base), the GPS base on the left side and the fish finder base on the right side. It is very tight inside the yak in those locations. A Craftsman offset ratchet wrench and THE SMALLEST SCREWS POSSIBLE IN LENGTH make this job a little easier. I had to use Wellnuts for the rod holder base on the right side. Wellnuts come in 2 differents sizes from KFS, I used the smaller ones. Just an fyi, I now use a Eagle Cuda 250 GPS/FF combo (uses same mount and transducer) which I like. No need to charge separate GPS unit batteries and mount separate GPS on the kayak.
http://www.marylandkayakfishing.com/pics/RiggedHobieAdventure/01.JPG
http://www.marylandkayakfishing.com/pics/RiggedHobieAdventure/02.JPG
http://www.marylandkayakfishing.com/pics/RiggedHobieAdventure/09.JPG
http://www.marylandkayakfishing.com/pics/RiggedHobieAdventure/10.JPG
http://www.marylandkayakfishing.com/pics/RiggedHobieAdventure/11.JPG
http://www.marylandkayakfishing.com/pics/Hobie/Hobie01.JPG
http://www.marylandkayakfishing.com/pics/Hobie/Hobie03.jpg

Rod,
I brought home an Adventurer yesterday. It's a 2007 and new. I am going to install two rod holders on the same places on your picture. I am thinking Scotty because they are pretty tough. But I feel I may kick the rods on Scotty rod holders when I pedal. But I don't know anything about Ram rod holders. Are the Ram rod holders tough? Do you think I can troll heavy lures? I just want to know if Ram holder is as tough as Scotty.

Thanks,
Joe

FishingRod
07-19-2009, 10:17 PM
Joe, congrats on the new Hobie! Ram rod tubes and ball base are stainless steel. I always troll a 5-inch storm wild eye shad in the tube. If you are trolling and hook up with a big fish or get a snag then there may be some movement in the tube were it connects to the ball. I don't mind the movement because it kind of like having secondary drag and may prevent breaking your line if your drag is too tight. You will not loose the tube or your rod. You will probably grab the rod before the tube moves too much. I like the Ram rod tubes because of the flexibility and ease to adjust in any position. You may want to make another post of Scotty vs Ram Rod Tubes to see other opinions and the pros vs cons.

Friday
07-20-2009, 06:09 AM
Thanks,
I will start the thread.
I did not know Ram bases are statinless steel. I though they are tough Plastic. The movement when a large fish strikes happens to Scotty too. My drag is set to as light as possible so that the line pulls out immediately even a small fish strikes. Otherwise, I will have broken rod tip or line.

Joe

ictalurus
07-20-2009, 07:12 AM
Congrats, Joe. I think you're really going to like fishing out of a Hobie.

Friday
07-27-2009, 08:38 AM
Adventurer is a big water kayak

On July 25, 2009, I headed for Breezy Point marina with my new Hobie Adventurer to verify if the Hobie Adventurer is a big water kayak as claimed by some of Adventurer owners. On the web I found some Adventurer owners’ opinions stating that Adventurer is the better kayak for the long distance trip in the Ocean.

The forecast said that the wind would be less than 10 knots until 1:00PM but it would become 20 knots from 2:00PM. So I expected the mean waves of 2.5-3 foot after 2:30 pm and I also hoped some 4 – 5 foot waves. I wanted see if my new Adventures can really take the big water as claimed by some owners of Adventurer.

Since this was my first real trip on my Adventurer excluding some tests done on calm water by the dealers, I planed to spend 2-3 hours in calm water and hit the big waves in the afternoon if I feel more comfortable.

On the calm water, between 9:45AM to 11:45 AM, I trolled with two lines out. On one line I put a Stretch 30 and a surface crank-bait, and on the other line I put one deep-diving crank-bait that dive 8 – 18 ft (I switched the single lures often). Trolling these two lines were not do-able on a conventional kayak for more than 30 minutes at speed of 2.5-3 mph. On Adventurer, my speed was about 3.0 MPH plus when I pedaled nice and easy pace without the aid of paddling. I wanted troll at 4 MPH, so I paddled (easy pace) in addition to the pedaling. I could maintain 4MPH for more than 2 hours with these lures with large draft. So I trolled the similar sets of lures for the remaining days for the real kayak-fisherman’s test.

I arrived at Buoy 78A around 11:45am.

Buoy 78A:
http://www.comeonfish.com/ChesapeakeBayAdventurer20090725/Buoy78AHobie.JPG

After 5 minutes brake, I trolled between buoy 78A and Parkers Creek. I caught 2 bluefish at 15 inches.

The first fish on my Hobie between Buoy 78A and Parker’s Creek:
http://www.comeonfish.com/ChesapeakeBayAdventurer20090725/BlueFirstonHobile.JPG

As forecasted, SSW wind started to blow at 1:30 PM. I trolled in 30’-35’ of water, about 2.5 miles south of Breezy Point marina, and 1 – 1.5 miles off the shore. I caught 2 more bluefish in 2 foot wave until 2:30PM.

Between 2:30PM and 4:40PM, the mean wave was about 2.5-3 foot. There were many 4 foot waves, and about fifteen 5 foot waves I faced. I trolled straight into the waves at 4 MPH. In order to achieve the speed of 4MPH (while pulling two sets of deep-diving lures), I had to paddle hard as well as pedaling. Pedaling alone, my speed was 2 -3 MPH. The kayak went over the most of waves. Only few waves went over the kayak by 4 inches. The kayak did not nose-dive. I intentionally let the waves (4 and 5 footers) hit the kayak broad-sided. Even though the kayak was flooded few times (when broad-sided by waves), the kayak was stable. And the water drained out immediately through the holes where the mirage drive was inserted. Which was very good thing.

Once I had to jump in the water to remove tangled braided line on the rudder. I had a bluefish on two lines but I forgot that I was trolling two lines. That made one line tangled very badly on the rudder. Initially I laid myself on my stomach on the stern and try to remove the line. But I could not do it because the sprays of water got into my eyes and the cooler and tackle bag hurt my stomach and ribs. So I jump in the water and cut the line tangled on the rudder. I usually do stern-side re-entry when wave is above 2 feet. Since I was familiar with Adventurer that time, I tried the center-side re-entry. I studied my Adventurer thoroughly for the reentry past few days. I knew the exact re-entry point (middle of the fattest part of Gunwale) on the gunwale, my hand locations. I visualized my center-side reentry many times. I held the gunwale (port side) with two hands about 1.5 feet in front of the seat. I pulled my self up, grab the handle on the other side with right hand, twisted/rotated my body, sat on the seat, and put my feet between the gunwales in one contiguous motion. It took less than 2 seconds. What I am trying to say is that the Adventurer was very stable during the re-entry. This maneuver was not do-able for the most of 13 footers and under. I could do it only on 15 footers in calm waters.

I snagged something on the bottom during the test. With aid of mirage drive, I could maneuver the kayak while bringing the other line and maintaining the same tension on the snagged line. This would be a very difficult task on a conventional kayak in the rough water. That was why I trolled with only one line on a conventional kayak.

The biggest advantage of Adventurer is its sheer speed in the rough water. Some owners of Adventurer mentioned that Adventurer outperforms the conventional kayaks by a lot in rough water. That is true. In calm water, my speed on a conventional kayak is a little slower than when I am on Adventurer for a short period time – about 30 minutes if I only pedal not paddle on Adventurer. Actually I have great upper body strength and endurance.

But in the rough water, my arms were no match to my legs. My legs were stronger and were not tired at all.

I could not believe I could manage 3-3.5 MPH for a couple of hours in 2.5-3 foot waves. I had so much fun hitting the waves. Once, I did not know that a boat was following me for a while because I had too much fun and loud wind and splash noise. A forty foot fishing boat named “Dice a Pair” came to me to see if I need help. I thanked him for looking out for a small craft, and told him I was testing my new kayak to see how well my kayak handle in rough water. The captain told me that small craft advisory in effect. The passengers probably thought I was a nut.

After that and after one more bluefish, I brought in trolling lures and I headed for Breezy Point Marina. Next 1.5 miles, with the help of downwind (waves) I pedaled and peddled very fast. Since I had very good speed, I tried the kayak-surfing – similar to body boarding. I made about 10 good kayak-surfing over 20’-30’ distance. I never made kayak-surfing with conventional kayaks because I could not paddle as fast as the incoming surf.

At the marina, I found that less than a quart of water was inside hull. That was amzin because I expected 2-4 gallons of water before the trip.

I paddled while pedaling for the most of time on Saturday. Today (Monday) while I am writing this, my arms and shoulder are still little sore but not my legs.

Adventurer is a big water kayak, I confirmed.
Joe

ictalurus
07-27-2009, 10:21 AM
Awesome report, Joe. When the waves start getting near/over the 2ft range is when I start chickening out. I'm surprised it could handle 4 footers broadside. There are two things I don't like about my Outback. One is that the bow plows a lot if the waves are spaced close together. The other thing I don't like is that it's pretty squirrelly in a following sea. If I can maintain enough speed to surf them, it's not so bad, but that's hard to do for extended periods. How did the Adventure do with the waves behind you when you weren't surfing?

Also, what fins do you have on the drive? If you don't have them, you'll probably like the Turbo fins. I have the ST fins, which are between the standard (rounded fins) and the big Turbos, and they seem much faster than the standard fins.

Nice work on the blues, too.

FishingRod
07-27-2009, 10:32 AM
Nice report! Like Bill said, you may want to try the ST or Turbo fins for more speed. I still need to upgrade my fins. I'll probably go with the ST fins.

How do you like the Ram Rod Tubes. Did you use nylon lock nuts or wellnuts to secure the bolts?

Friday
07-27-2009, 12:34 PM
Awesome report, Joe. When the waves start getting near/over the 2ft range is when I start chickening out. I'm surprised it could handle 4 footers broadside. There are two things I don't like about my Outback. One is that the bow plows a lot if the waves are spaced close together. The other thing I don't like is that it's pretty squirrelly in a following sea. If I can maintain enough speed to surf them, it's not so bad, but that's hard to do for extended periods. How did the Adventure do with the waves behind you when you weren't surfing?

Also, what fins do you have on the drive? If you don't have them, you'll probably like the Turbo fins. I have the ST fins, which are between the standard (rounded fins) and the big Turbos, and they seem much faster than the standard fins.

Nice work on the blues, too.

Bill, I don't think you can capsize an Outback in 4-5 foot waves.
When I ride waves behind me, the waves never went over the kayak. For my weight class, adventurer is an aircraft career. I think Max weight of 350 lb is totally underrated. I think it should be 425lb.

Joe

Friday
07-27-2009, 01:16 PM
Nice report! Like Bill said, you may want to try the ST or Turbo fins for more speed. I still need to upgrade my fins. I'll probably go with the ST fins.

How do you like the Ram Rod Tubes. Did you use nylon lock nuts or wellnuts to secure the bolts?

I think I have ST fins installed. Also the kayak came with a set of Turbo Fins. They are still in the package. I am going to install the trubo fins later.

You said you use a smaller wellnuts (size 8). But I think I used size 10 which poped up when I order Ram tubes from KFS. Three of the wellnuts failed. the brass nuts came loose way before I tightened up the bolts. To reposition the brass nuts on the wellnuts, I tried to reach the rubber part of wellnuts by sticking my arm into the center hatch. I could reach the all 8 (4 on each side) wellnuts. So, One side is fastened with nuts with nylon inserts (I had all kinds of stainless nuts). The other side was fastened with wellnuts.

I had to use two washers, one small and one big (I already had them) for each hole (too large) before I put the nuts with nylon insert. And I sealed entire base of ram holder with silicon bath tub calking.

Also, I added a washer and a nut with nylon insert to each wellnut bolts in case the brass nut comes loose form the rubber tube.

Later, I went to Lowes and found size 8 and 10 wellnuts with brass nuts. The length of rubber tube on Lowes wellnut were about 1/2 inch. I think the Lowes Wellnuts are correct size for Kayak. The ones from KFS was about an inch long. One inch is too long for kayak because the thickeness of kayak is about 1/8 inch.

If I had known that I could reach the spots, I would use the nuts with the nylon inserts.

I was afraid to tighten the wellnuts too much. So, the Ram tube wiggles. But it is ok because my drag on the reels will be set very light.

Because I have short arms and I sit all the way back, it was little hard to handle the rods on the Ram tubes. I may use Ram tubes for primarily to place the rods vertically. I am thinking about adding a simple rod rest (something like arrow rest on the bow) to the outside of a Ram Tube so that I can lay a rod (with bait) on the rod rest when I don’t pedal. Of course the rod butt will be on my lap. That way I can jig with one rod and I will be ready when a fish strike the other rod on the rod rest with bait.

Joe

JoshKaptur
07-28-2009, 12:48 PM
When you say 4-5 footers, I'm assuming you really mean 2-2.5 foot seas, right? A 5 ft wave is actually 10 feet tall from trough to crest... something you will rarely see in the bay.

I'm a much larger adventure owner than you (200+ pounds) and can still agree with all your points. Sometimes when fishing mine in a following sea I will have some bow steer issues and feel like I'm going to get pitched out of the yak when it turns sharply... but it's never actually happened.

hale33
07-28-2009, 08:15 PM
Great Report, very informative....don't think I've ever been in 4+ foot seas (or want to). I love having an Outback and an Adventure. I feel comfortable in the Outback in just about any sea conditions, but I really enjoy the speed and distance I can cover in the Adventure. One thing I've noticed is my Adventure is more stealthy, noise wise. The outback makes a lot more splashing sounds when sneaking up in on fish in the shallows. If I had to have just one and only one Yak I'd went with a Revolution....kinda mixture of both Outback and Adventure.

ictalurus
07-29-2009, 07:21 AM
When you say 4-5 footers, I'm assuming you really mean 2-2.5 foot seas, right? A 5 ft wave is actually 10 feet tall from trough to crest... something you will rarely see in the bay.


Actually, wave heights are measured from trough to crest, at least in oceanography. I saw a study by the Coast Guard somewhere that found that wave heights are often correlated with boat length.:scratchchin3: I know 2 footers look a lot bigger from my kayak than they do from the 18ft and 26ft boats we have at the lab. :pp

Friday
07-29-2009, 08:02 AM
Josh,
I was like you 5-20 years ago. I used Amplitude and others were using Height when we described the waves. Amplitude was actually used to describe the roughness of the water long time ago. This makes you and I are old-timers:D. Somehow, somewhere, it changed. I confused other boaters and other boaters confused me about the rough water we had some days. I also went by mean waves. But many people used the average waves or highest waves.

Past few years, I changed. I started go by Height of wave, because that made more sense to other boaters. I think Height is more widely commonly used than Amplitude.

Here is another example. I used to say kilo-calorie (Cal – Upper case C) when I talked about Calories on foods). But now I just say calorie (cal – lower case c) because kilo-calorie is not the familiar term (even though kilo-calorie is correct)

But I still use height of MEAN waves, not averaged nor highest

I should have stated clearly that I used height. for example, I should say 2 foot height wave instead of 2 foot wave

For others interested in waves in the ocean:

I like this site. It has the sections showing Theoretical Max Wave Height base on the depths of water and wind.
Understanding and Utilizing the Secrets of Waves - BoatSafe.com (http://www.boatsafe.com/nauticalknowhow/waves.htm)

NOAA
National Weather Service Forecast Office - Upton, NY (http://www.erh.noaa.gov/okx/marine_def.html)

US Navy training materials
Integrated Publishing - Educational Training Manuals (http://www.tpub.com/content/aerograp...s/14269_58.htm)

This one is the most descriptive.
Rutgers University Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences
Rutgers Marine Sciences Class - Class Notes 9/17 (http://marine.rutgers.edu/dmcs/ms200/waves.html)