PDA

View Full Version : Good Information State wants to buy out LCC holders



Clark W. Griswold
07-09-2009, 09:21 PM
Maryland Department of Natural Resources - Communications Office (http://www.dnr.state.md.us/dnrnews/pressrelease2009/070909.asp)

Voluntary License Buy-back Program to Aid Blue Crab Conservation

Federal Blue Crab Disaster Funds will be used to purchase commercial limited crab catcher licenses

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — In an important effort toward effective management of Maryland’s blue crab population, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is offering to permanently buy back 3,676 commercial limited crab catcher (LCC) licenses. DNR is implementing this buy-back program in response to public feedback offering solutions for reducing the number of inactive crabbing licenses. Yesterday the agency mailed letters to all current LCC license holders informing them of this voluntary program, which will use Federal Blue Crab Disaster Funds to reduce latent effort in Maryland’s commercial blue crab fishery. Latent effort is defined as fishing effort that is not currently deployed in the fishery.

To sustainably manage the blue crab fishery, the Bay-wide targeted annual blue crab harvest is limited to removal of 46 percent of the population. Last year, in a coordinated strategy to limit the 2008 harvest to the 46 percent target and to begin rebuilding the depleted crab population, Maryland, Virginia and the Potomac River Fisheries Commission adopted measures to reduce the harvest of the spawning stock of female blue crabs by 34 percent. The most recent winter dredge survey results noted a substantial increase in the adult population over 2008, indicating new management measures are working.

Inactive licenses account for approximately one-third of LCC license holders, making it difficult to adopt management strategies that will ensure the harvest target is met, while allowing full-time active crabbers to make an adequate wage. Having such a large number of people who may or may not crab in any given year poses a long-term biological and economic threat to a rebuilding stock.

“Our concern is if even a fraction of these individuals decide to re-enter the fishery in a given year, our regulations will not be sufficient to maintain the harvest target,” said DNR Secretary John Griffin. “The license buy-back program is our first step to reduce the amount of latent effort in Maryland’s commercial blue crab fishery.”

To address this problem, DNR is offering a commercial limited buy-back program through a reverse auction. The process requires individuals to submit bids to the Department for the amount of money they determine their license to be worth. If an individual chooses to sell his or her license and DNR accepts the bid, the license will be permanently retired. DNR held four open houses in April – targeting commercial crabbers and key legislators -- to educate the public on the problem of latent effort and to obtain public input on possible solutions.

The deadline for submitting bids to DNR is July 31, 2009. After receiving all bids, DNR will use the range of bids received to calculate the maximum acceptable bid. Bids under that amount will be accepted from lowest to highest, until the available budget is exhausted. Individuals will be notified of acceptance or rejection of their bid by August 15, 2009, and accepted bidders will receive their payments in early September, 2009.

If inactive license holders choose not to submit a bid, or if DNR does not accept the auction bid, the license will be subject to new regulations that will be proposed in fall 2009. If approved, these regulations will require inactive LCC license holders to choose among several options. These may include: access to a limited, male-only harvest, with the licensing becoming non-transferable; or a temporary freeze of the license until the blue crab population has maintained target abundance, as determined by the Chesapeake Bay Stock Assessment Committee. An inactive license holder is defined as an individual who has not reported any harvest between April 1, 2004 and December 15, 2008. The deadline to return 2008 reports to the Department was January 2, 2009. Reports received by the Department after January 31, 2009 will not be counted toward an individual’s harvest history.

“Our counterparts in Virginia are also pursuing a license buy-back program this summer using Federal Blue Crab Disaster Funds, and the Potomac River Fisheries Commission is discussing this as well,” said Fisheries Director Tom O’Connell. “Working in close coordination with them, we can continue to do our job of maintaining the Bay’s iconic blue crab fishery so that it will prosper for many generations to come.”

Last year, Maryland and Virginia were each awarded $10 million in Federal Blue Crab Disaster Funds from NOAA‘s National Marine Fisheries Service, in response to a request from Governors O’Malley and Kaine, and advocacy by the Maryland Congressional Delegation under the leadership of Senator Barbara Mikulski. In June, Maryland applied for an additional $5 million in Federal Blue Crab Disaster Funding that became available in May.

Maryland’s Federal Blue Crab Fisheries Disaster Funding is being directed toward work for watermen, addressing latent effort, a quality crab meat assurance program, economic diversification into aquaculture, packaging equipment upgrades for processors, a seafood marketing program for blue crabs and enhanced harvest reporting and enforcement of crabbing restrictions.

In 2008, Governor Martin O’Malley worked with Maryland legislators to identify $3 million to fund a work program through which more than 500 watermen have conducted oyster bar rehabilitation activities. An additional $3 million is included in the State’s FY ’10 budget to continue this important work.

Detailed summaries of open house material, summaries of public comment received and LCC buy back information are available at www.dnr.state.md.us/fisheries/crab/crabindex.html (http://www.tidalfish.com/fisheries/crab/crabindex.html).

BowMovements
07-10-2009, 06:55 AM
Yea and if they don't wanna sell them they are going to review the need for further actions. What a crock of @#*%. I'll be leaving this post alone. I'm sure someone will get te boot before it gets locked.

Butthead
07-10-2009, 07:42 AM
Whats wrong with this??? they did a similar thing for tobacco farmers....it helped them transition to another type of crop....maybe this will help crabbers that are struggling transition to another line of work.

BIG EYE
07-10-2009, 07:55 AM
What a bunch of crap. Maryland should do what Virginia did to me last year, just declare the licence void, with no refund at all. Oh, that's right Maryland is kinder and genteler. Simple, if the licence has not been used over a 6 month period, it's gone.:clapping2:

rgminer
07-10-2009, 08:19 AM
It's voluntary...for now...I can see that "further action" clause used to take those inactive ones, and possibly others if they don't enough volunteers...The permits are state property, they can take them when ever, from whomever they wish...will make for a good court case though I am sure..

BILL H
07-10-2009, 11:24 AM
This offer is the carrot. The stick is being held in the background just to focus attention.

swimfaster02
07-10-2009, 01:34 PM
Spend tax payer $$$ to have a seafood marketing program for blue crabs? Does this make any sense? Paying people who have licenses but don't crab will help the stock? Pay processors to upgrade their equipment? Huh?

27 sailfish
07-10-2009, 03:29 PM
Any idea what a LLC has sold for recently ?

I see a huge problem with the real value and perceived value.

heimdall
07-10-2009, 03:40 PM
Any idea what a LLC has sold for recently ?

I see a huge problem with the real value and perceived value.

You can't use an LCC to run charters. Captain's license first, then FGR or TFL.

BowMovements
07-10-2009, 06:54 PM
Any idea what a LLC has sold for recently ?

I see a huge problem with the real value and perceived value.

One: it's LCC not LLC, Two: The business transfers have been going for 4500.00
Yea I know I said I wasn't gonna comment but he had a question. :pp

POLECAT
07-10-2009, 07:27 PM
By law the transfer of a LCC cannot be less than $2000.00.
I'll bet that law doesn't stand during the reverse auction process.

Any takers?

rgminer
07-10-2009, 07:33 PM
Spend tax payer $$$ to have a seafood marketing program for blue crabs? Does this make any sense? Paying people who have licenses but don't crab will help the stock? Pay processors to upgrade their equipment? Huh?

They have been doing the same thing with the put and take oyster fishing for years. It costs the tax payer roughly $20 per oyster to plant them and the watermen make about 25 cents or so when the harvest and sell them...Make sense to you?

crow
07-10-2009, 08:44 PM
Couple of thoughts: first the state is not going to pay out more than what someone could sell their license in the paper for. Second, folk that want to keep their license but don't necessarily crab anymore are going to report catch that they didn't get just to say they crabbed so they can keep their license. This is going to cause false numbers for the population.

redbeard
07-11-2009, 05:45 PM
to late to falsify reports, the control dates are from 04- 08 if you did not report in that time period then reporting now will do you no good. the letter they sent me said that while bizz transfers could not be less than 2000 $ that is for the lic. and equipmet. in the letter dnr says they're not buying equipment just the lic. bysaying this i guess they're saying that the lic is not werth 2000. i won't sell for any amount at this time and it won't have a bearing on me because i've reported any where from 25 to 50 bu. per year form the last 8-9 years. next it will be under utilized lic. and the fight will be on

Thoroughbred
07-11-2009, 08:43 PM
What a bunch of crap. Maryland should do what Virginia did to me last year, just declare the licence void, with no refund at all. Oh, that's right Maryland is kinder and genteler. Simple, if the licence has not been used over a 6 month period, it's gone.:clapping2:

I would give it two seasons (years) but after that VOID. It's funny and sad to see how merland handles such things.

Nummer1
07-12-2009, 06:56 AM
Long term economic and biological threat while rebuilding stock, whats next? I am still suspicious of the DNR / MD govt motives in all this. The latest WDS shows increases and " is working", I wonder what the margin of error is on this crab census. SO the goals are to increase crab populations so full time watermen can make a decent wage, and our kids and grandkids can see what a crab is. If supply was to go up wouldnt prices come down or fewer people would try to harvest until the prices stabilize or just quit. I am sure more restrictions to come. I wouldnt suspect the DNR will relax restrictions any time soon and have all of their hard work undone. we'll see

stingray
07-12-2009, 08:52 AM
Couple of thoughts: first the state is not going to pay out more than what someone could sell their license in the paper for. Second, folk that want to keep their license but don't necessarily crab anymore are going to report catch that they didn't get just to say they crabbed so they can keep their license. This is going to cause false numbers for the population.

If false (elevated) catches are reported as you stated, then the state would have a reason and desire to add more restrictions based on catch numbers vs crab population. Either way, they would acheive their goal.
But as redbeard said, 04 -08 data.

Porter316
07-12-2009, 09:29 AM
Second, folk that want to keep their license but don't necessarily crab anymore are going to report catch that they didn't get just to say they crabbed so they can keep their license.


this already goes on.....

BIG NATURALS
07-13-2009, 12:38 AM
DNR might try to use the Federal money for better law enforcement. There are clearly not enough DNR police officers to effectively enforce the laws that already exist to promote Blue Crab Conservation. I don't think that spending tax payer money to buy back licenses that are not currently being used would be an effictive method of conservation and here is my reasoning.
1) It is the law that if you have a commercial license you must report your catch. If you don't report your catch, your license is revoked. PERIOD

2) If the LCC license holder is and has been using their license and reporting their catch in accordance with the law then that license holder has the right and privilege to hold their license or sell it as part of their business. In this case, the DNR is getting accurate information and there is no threat to their calculations.

3) If the State of Maryland is trying to conserve the Blue Crab Fishery for the residents of the State of Maryland then stop issuing recreational crabbing licenses to out of state residents. (how many PA boats do you see out there?) Sure the DNR is getting a little money up front from the sale of the license but now having to spend ??? (hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars) on buying back licenses in a failed attempt to restore the Blue Crab population. The bottom line is that if Maryland dosen't spend the money that the Federal Government has allotted then Maryland will not get as much money from the Feds next year. It's simple economics. If you don't spend all of your budget then the budget will be smaller next time. Lets try to save the tax payers some money and do the right thing for a change.

4) Any money that the State has recieved for the Blue Crabs should be spent on cleaning up the environment that the crabs live in. In some cases there are signs posted that read ... DON'T EAT THE SEAFOOD FROM THIS AREA. Why is that? Well it is because of high levels of heavy metals (Pb & Hg) in the water as well as other pollutants. I have even seen signs that read ... NO SWIMMING IN THIS AREA due to large quantities of raw sewage that has been "SPILLED" dumped in to the bay and it's tributaries. I have a sign in the storm water run off stream next to my house the states that raw sewage may be present there. I have grown up and lived in the same area of Parkville for 99% of my 39 years. I played in that same stream as a child for countless hours with my five brothers and all of our friends. Myself, one of my brothers and three of my friends who all grew up in that neighborhood and played in that stream have all had testicular cancer and when I contacted the CDC (Center for Disease Control) about the raw sewage and the "Cluster" of cancer patients in the area they just blew me off. I would like to clarify that the sign was only posted about three years ago but I am sure that the dumping of raw sewage goes way back. If they know about it, why don't they use this money to fix the problem to "SAVE THE BAY" and possibly save our children and future generations from the possibility of contracting a carcinogen from our states most important natural resource. And don't forget the hundreds of business that are dumping toxic chemicals into the bay on a daily basis. Lets clean them up too. Where are you EPA?

5) Post the existing DNR police officers at the public landings from 10 am to 2 pm on weekends to check on the catch of the recreational crabbers. They could use that time to enforce the existing catch limit laws as well as get an accurate count of the amount of the harvest. Then the number crunchers could use that data to assist in their calculations. Kudos to the DNR police officers. I have had the pleasure of meeting several of them this year and I must say that I haven't been treated more fairly or friendly by any other law enforcement agency. We just need more of you.

I could probably go on but that's enough for now.
Thanks for reading

rock n crab
07-13-2009, 08:05 AM
What I like in my letter from DNR is when they say if all Licenses were used their current regulations would not support it... To me that sounds like they need to rethink their regulations....

Ken Brice
07-13-2009, 09:00 AM
Couple of thoughts: first the state is not going to pay out more than what someone could sell their license in the paper for. Second, folk that want to keep their license but don't necessarily crab anymore are going to report catch that they didn't get just to say they crabbed so they can keep their license. This is going to cause false numbers for the population.

Wouldn't they also have to let the IRS know, unless they are all for personal consumption?? Just wondering..