Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    29

    Default Here's a great article regarding tuna.

    http://docs.google.com/a/odu.edu/gvi...ventSource=SSO

    Though you guys might find this interesting..

  2. #2
    Russ D is online now Rock Star TF Poster - Not a Tidal Fish Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,883

    Default

    Can't see it without sign in info.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    29

    Default

    OHSHIMA, JAPAN—With a snap of its jaws, a
    meter-long bluefin tuna grabs a fish tossed
    into its circular enclosure and darts away in
    murky Kushimoto Bay. “They’re excellent
    swimmers,” says Yoshifumi Sawada, a fisheries
    biologist at Kinki University’s Ohshima
    Experiment Station, as he shovels fish into
    the water. The note of pride in his voice is
    understandable: The bluefins in the pen are
    the product of a 30-year effort to rear secondgeneration
    captive tuna—something no other
    group in the world has accomplished. It’s “a
    magnificent achievement,” says Daniel
    Pauly, a fisheries biologist at the University
    of British Columbia, Vancouver.
    The feat could hold vital significance for
    one of the ocean’s keystone predators. In
    recent decades, the bluefin tuna’s succulent
    belly meat has become the favorite of sushi
    and sashimi aficionados, driving the price
    sky high. Tunas auctioned at Tokyo’s Tsukiji
    fish market routinely fetch tens of thousands
    of dollars; in 2001, a prize 202-kilogram
    specimen sold for an astounding ¥20.2 million,
    or roughly $1000 per kilogram.
    To satiate rising demand, dozens of tuna
    farms have sprung up off Japan’s coasts.
    Each year, Japanese fishers capture 300,000
    to 400,000 young bluefins from the open
    ocean and fatten them in pens before shipping
    them off to wholesalers. But removing
    juveniles from the wild has only increased
    pressure on the heavily fished species, leaving
    some populations on the brink of collapse
    (see sidebar).
    The bluefin’s eccentricities have contributed
    to its downfall. “The bluefin tuna has
    habits that are completely wrong for species
    survival,” says Gary Sakagawa, a fisheries
    biologist at the U.S. National Oceanic and
    Atmospheric Administration’s Southwest
    Fisheries Science Center in San Diego, California.
    For instance, young
    tuna congregate in coastal
    areas in spring and summer as
    they feed on schooling fish,
    making them easy prey for
    fishers, Sakagawa says.
    The researchers at Kindai,
    as the university is known
    locally, hope their breakthrough
    will give wild tuna a
    reprieve. “We want to supply
    all of the farmed bluefin tuna
    harvested in Japan,” says
    Sawada. They have a long way
    to go. This year, Sawada says
    they hope to sell up to 20,000
    juveniles to fish farms, a small fraction of
    what’s needed. “This technology will take a
    while to have a positive impact on the conservation
    of tuna,” says Pauly.
    Kindai’s tuna program started in 1970,
    when “it seemed Japanese were eating up all
    the world’s tuna,” says university trustee
    Hidemi Kumai, a fisheries biologist who led
    the Kindai research for years. Concerned that
    the country would be blamed for depleting
    wild tuna stocks, Japan’s Fisheries Agency
    funded three groups, including one at Kindai,
    to try raising bluefin tuna from eggs.
    As a private university with campuses
    scattered across a rugged peninsula that juts
    into the Pacific Ocean southeast of Osaka,
    Kindai emphasizes “practical studies”
    attuned to the needs of local agricultural and
    fishing communities, Kumai says. Kindai
    had already succeeded in raising yellowtail,
    sea bream, sole, and other fish from eggs.
    The university sells fry to farmers and harvests
    mature fish for the market, then sinks
    the proceeds into research.
    The know-how gleaned from farming
    other fish, however, didn’t readily transfer to
    bluefins. “Tuna have many unique characteristics
    that make culturing them difficult,”
    says Sawada. For starters, bluefin tuna, one
    of the larger oceanic predators, are simply
    much bigger than other farmed fish. A halfcentury
    ago, before overfishing started to
    take its toll, 4-meter-long tuna tipping the
    scales at half a ton were common. These
    days, mature bluefins can exceed 2 meters in
    length and weigh 250 kilograms.
    When it comes to captive breeding, more
    than size matters. Tuna, unlike most pelagic
    f ish, are warm-blooded. And like some
    sharks, they must move continuously to
    force water over their gills; otherwise, they
    suffocate. “They swim all day, all through
    their lives,” Sawada says.
    Bluefins are built for both
    speed and endurance: They
    can accelerate as quickly as a
    sports car, and they crisscross
    the Atlantic several times a
    year. For these reasons, tunas
    require pens much bigger
    than those used for other captive
    fish.
    It took the Kindai group
    4 years to learn how to keep
    penned tuna alive longer than
    a few months. Then it took
    another 5 years, until 1979, to
    get them to spawn. That was a
    world first, Kumai says, but his team couldn’t
    keep the spawned fish alive. Then, for more
    than a decade, they couldn’t get captive tuna
    to spawn at all.
    Facing similar difficulties, the two competing
    research groups gave up, and Kumai
    worried that Kindai’s program would get the
    ax. At one point, he confessed to Kindai’spresident that his team had “no results
    despite spending a lot of money.” “The president
    said to me, ‘You have to take the long
    view when considering living creatures,’ ”
    Kumai recalls. With such encouragement,
    he says, the group resolved to “succeed in
    this project at any cost.” (The price of success
    is hard to quantify, he says, as the Fisheries
    Laboratory, with an annual budget of
    about $25 million, doesn’t itemize expenses
    by project.) Finally, in 1994 their captive
    tunas spawned again.
    Through sheer persistence, the team has
    gained a trove of information about tuna biology.
    Postmortems on dead juveniles revealed
    that many fish were snapping their necks by
    swimming into the walls of the square enclosures.
    Such injuries tapered off after fish
    passed their 80th day. In juvenile tuna, the tail
    f in, used for propulsion, develops more
    quickly than the pectoral and abdominal fins,
    which adults use to steer and brake, Kumai
    says. “The only thing [juvenile] tuna can do is
    dash straight ahead,” he says. To reduce the
    number of deadly collisions, the researchers
    switched to circular enclosures.
    After numerous other tweaks to rearing
    techniques, the Kindai team eventually bred
    mature fish. Six fish spawned in 1995, and
    16 from the class of 1996 survived to adulthood.
    Those fish spawned in 2002, and
    Kindai is now rearing the third generation.
    “We’ve completed the life cycle,” Kumai
    says. That, says Sakagawa, “gives us some
    idea what may be going on in nature.” The
    Kindai group has identified behavioral triggers
    for spawning and clarified that the time
    of first spawn is more closely related to size
    than age. The group acknowledges that they
    still have a lot to learn. Kumai figures they
    get mature fish from only about 1% of eggs,
    compared with 60% for sea bream.
    The Kindai group now hopes to develop
    an attractive product. They are selectively
    breeding tuna for fast growth, disease resistance,
    and higher-quality meat, Sawada says.
    The group does not plan to genetically engineer
    tuna out of concerns about unforeseen
    consequences if fish were to escape into the
    wild. But they are introducing the use of
    molecular markers, small DNA fragments
    that identify desirable traits, says Yasuo
    Agawa, a molecular biologist who cut his
    teeth on Drosophila and recently joined the
    Kindai team. Pauly, however, worries that
    the feed requirements of scaled-up tuna
    farming could harm wild stocks of feed fish,
    many of which are a staple for people in
    developing countries.
    That might be avoided if the Kindai
    group’s most ambitious plan succeeds: to
    transform their captives into vegetarians.
    Sawada says they intend to gradually substitute
    plant protein for fish feed, in part to
    improve the program’s sustainability. Pauly,
    for one, is skeptical. “This is where these
    plans veer off into science fiction,” he says.
    He notes that despite decades of trying, the
    Norwegian salmon industry has not weaned
    farmed salmon off a fish diet.
    It is unclear what impact the landmark
    breeding success might have on wild tuna
    stocks. Sakagawa worries that replacing fish
    caught for farms with juveniles raised from
    eggs might simply expand the market, as
    happened when Australian fisheries started
    pen-rearing captured Southern Pacif ic
    bluefins. He says he appreciates Kindai’s
    contributions to understanding tuna reproductive
    biology. However, Sakagawa says, “I
    don’t think it’s a solution for conservation of
    wild stocks.”
    Toward that end, Japan’s Fisheries
    Research Agency is working to raise tuna
    from eggs for release. To have an impact on
    natural populations, a restocking effort
    would have to be massive—and “many issues
    need to be solved before [we can] start to
    release tuna,” says agency official Kazumasa
    Ikuta. But as the Kindai team has demonstrated
    in their decades-long effort to breed
    tuna, patience is a virtue.
    –DENNIS NORMILE

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    776

    Default

    Nope.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    2,484
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Sounds like propoganda to keep the media at bay and allow Japan to literally take every tuna they can out of the water. Rather than growing fish to breed in their pens, they should be concentrating on getting a higher percentage of that 1% of eggs to maturity. Rather than trying to raise 300,00-400,000 fish annually to maturity for spawning and marketing, it seems a whole lot smarter and feesable to capture 5,000 spawning females near spawning, fertilize and grow their eggs, hatch millions of fry, and grow them to a size capable of fending for themselves in the wild. If they could raise huge numbers of tunas to the 20 pounds plus size for live wild release, they may actually be able to help restock the population which they have destroyed. Raising bluefins from eggs to giant size is impractical and stupid when you consider the amount of supply of bluefin needed to accomodate their tastes and the expense to raise each fish. Each fish alone would eat thousands of pounds of food.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Link to Us   Subscription Information   Advertising Information   Terms of Service   Privacy Policy   Resources   Contact Us   About Us

©2012 TidalFish.com. All Rights Reserved.