Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    39

    Default Summer Flounder regs

    I sort of find it sadly amusing that our regulators are quibbling over whether the minimum size limit for a flounder should be 17 or 17 1/2 inches. This for a fish that grows to over 20 lbs + if only given half a chance. Nobody agrees with me, but I think that anything under 3-4 lbs needs to go back and grow some more.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    3,054

    Default

    option c sounds good to me
    C) 17 inches minimum size limit, 4 fish possession limit and no closed season

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    4,525
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gradymania View Post
    I sort of find it sadly amusing that our regulators are quibbling over whether the minimum size limit for a flounder should be 17 or 17 1/2 inches. This for a fish that grows to over 20 lbs + if only given half a chance. Nobody agrees with me, but I think that anything under 3-4 lbs needs to go back and grow some more.
    I agree w/ you


    Rock The RED !!


  4. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    281

    Default

    C) 17 inches minimum size limit, 4 fish possession limit and no closed season

    4 per person is plenty for me. Of course I generally don't catch my limit so the point is moot.....
    Stubby

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    38

    Default

    17 inches 5 fish no closed season option B sounds like the best choice!

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,359

    Default

    For me it does not matter. If they set the size at 17 1/2 all the fish I catch will be 16 1/2. If they set the size at 16 1/2 all the fish I catch will be 15 1/2. Go figure.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    714

    Default

    Option B.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    5,394

    Default

    I was under the impression that the total coastal flounder stock was struggling, so I am suprised they are letting folks take that many r fish per person, smaller sizes and no restrictions on the big ones to protect the breeding stocks. By taking smaller fish we may limit the number of tons recreational anglers take, but isn't it all about the total number of spawning fish we take out of the stock?

    Just asking?

    Kevin
    Weekend Mistress

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    4,525
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    ...........

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    2,674

    Default

    I'm guessing if the limit was set at a length that was equal to a 3-4lb flounder it would do more harm than good. I know for me we would end up throwing back at least 75% of what we catch and I'm guessing released flounder have a higher mortality rate than other species. I have thrown back a number of smaller ones knowing they were not gonna make from being gut hooked. I think what is important is the size of a flounder capable of spawning, and keep the limit length restriction above that to ensure a population capable of replacing itself. Fishing is supposed to be fun and throwing back everything under 4lbs would be as frustrating as playing a round of golf.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Link to Us   Subscription Information   Advertising Information   Terms of Service   Privacy Policy   Resources   Contact Us   About Us

©2012 TidalFish.com. All Rights Reserved.