Page 16 of 24 FirstFirst ... 1415161718 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 238
  1. #151
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    94
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default


  2. #152
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,735

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pitched up View Post
    In my opinion, two people that are either pissed because they don't get federal money to retrieve ghost pots or are looking for federal money to do a study and can't get it. so the way I see the problem is: Commercial people do lose gear, sometimes by themselves by placing pots in the path of a rec. person deciding not to run the channels, then by setting them out of the way and a boater running over them in the dark because the boater can not see them, I could go on and on but why bother I have summed it up in my mind and came to a conclusion: two people on here need to do some scientific studying and come up with the facts to figure my conclusion out, round and round, beat the dead horse some more!
    The loss of crab pots has revealed that there are some real problems with the crab pot fishery that can be solved, likely to the benefit of all parties. I have an open mind to all solutions. I have offered a bunch of ideas, but I know none of them alone will fix the crab pot fishery.

    I'm not sure what's preventing you from having a legitimate conversation about this topic, and I don't really care. However, if anyone really wants to discuss ways to improve the fishery to cut down on lost gear and the ecological problems that go with it, reduce user conflict, and possibly even create more full time crabbing jobs, I'd love to have that conversation. Lost gear and lots of other problems with the crab (pot) fishery causing it to underperform.

  3. #153
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    1,936

    Default

    I agree with your message Scott. Constructive debate about commercial crabbing, however, is infrequent.

    Experts across the board have agreed commercial crabbing is overcapitalized, with too much gear and too much effort, active and latent. Adding a complex variable like lost gear begs for discussion, if not an overhaul in the way the pot fishery is managed. Yet commercial interests offer no solution, accept no proposals, and desire to squash any discussion about fishery problems and potential solutions. Another example why commercial fishing is its own worst enemy.

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    21,481

    Default

    FWIW: On Saturday just south of bay bridge - saw this first hand.

    Current was outgoing at a very strong rate. Some crab pot floats out in 20 feet were being pulled just under the surface of the water.

    They would shimmy and wiggle as current pushed them - then pop back up after about 30 seconds or so.

    A boat about 22 feet or so was drifting for bottom fish and the lower unit got tangled in a crab pot line.

    I saw the boat slowly spin around and the angler raised the engine and leaned out and cut the line free.

    The float drifted out from his boat and went past my anchored boat. Add one more lost pot to total.
    What could be more mundane than dying of old age or of natural causes when there is death by misadventure to be pursued ? Skip

  5. #155
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    89

    Default

    I too saw a pot get cut this weekend, by the magothy river. I am glad I'm not the only one who witnesses this.

    On a side note skip, when the lines are tighter like that in my short time running pots, I have found they are less likely to get sucked into props. Seems its longer more loose lines on the surface that get picked up more often.

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    683

    Default

    I don't have access to the nmma statistics, but without a doubt, recreational boating has increased a great deal in the last 10-15 years. However, the state has not issued an inordinate amount of crabbing licenses, so there has not been an exponential increase in pots.

    The fact is, pots don't last long in the main stem of the bay. The watermen that participated in the recovery (at least in the mid-bay region) seldom recovered complete pots. Generally, they were just irons, that frequently tore apart just hauling them to the boat. When they pull something in, they record in a booklet what it is, and in what state it's in. This is something that isn't mentioned in the study. Based on the video, it would be easy to assume that every pot recovered was in great shape and loaded with life. That is very rarely the case. Once the bait is gone, it stops catching. That doesn't take long either. Then the small zinc eats away, followed by the pot. For every pot brought up that had an oyster toad in it (which is what it usually was if there was something in it), there was a pot with spat struck on it...
    Only point I'm trying to make, as I mentioned before, is that there's a number of people that believe the study and it's subsequent findings have been sensationalized. Not unheard of considering some organizations use grant money to do their studies, and need to show some fruits to the labor in order to keep things going.

    As far as across the board expert agreement that the industry is overcapitalized, I haven't seen it, but would be willing to read the testimony with an open mind. I'm also open to discussion (engaged in one here, actually) about the concerns, but still feel that I haven't seen what I (and many others) consider definitive proof that the problem is as great as some believe, and that the onus is wholly on the potters to stop making their living to appease a relatively small group.
    Skips' post is an example I'll use.
    The boat he saw drifted through the pots becoming entangled. I always raise my motor when drifting around pots, a potential hazard, and since I'm underway and making way, it is still my resposibility to be aware of my surroundings.
    Then, rather than take the time to untangle the pot, the boater chose to simply cut the line.
    To me, and many others, that boater is responsible for that lost pot.
    If the "experts" think crabbing and how its done is overcapitalized, mis-managed and in need of an overhaul, I say let the so called experts (who were they again?) in their infinite wisdom provide a solution.

  7. #157
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    89

    Default

    Ahh the experts... they are truly enlightened. Must be like the superfriends or the avengers. Maybe we could give them a cool name like "super fishfriends".

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    4,872

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by buckshotgumbo View Post
    I don't have access to the nmma statistics, but without a doubt, recreational boating has increased a great deal in the last 10-15 years. However, the state has not issued an inordinate amount of crabbing licenses, so there has not been an exponential increase in pots.
    Now you're just making stuff up. There are about 200,000 boats registered in Maryland and that number has been declining. Further, new boats are not replenishing that number as quickly as they used to, such that the state just passed a law increasing registration fees to make up some of the difference.

    With regard to what was being found in ghost pots - I refer you back to the VIMS study:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=Z3md2mUZ7nw

    As the owner of a couple of pots - I can tell you definitively that the statement "Once the bait is gone, it stops catching" is incorrect. A baitless pot attracts crabs and other critters constantly.

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    1,936

    Default

    Chris, you could have also picked on his statement about "an inordinate amount of crabbing licenses" ...numerous peer reviewed studies have concluded the States HAVE issued too many licenses. That why fishery experts have reached strong consensus the fishery is overcapitalized. Overcapitalization is why the States have initiated buy-back programs. Overcapitalization is why the fishery collapsed, and why a complete rebound and a sustainable condition is unlikely. These are facts worth repeating, even if thread opponents and commercial apologists choose to ignore. Bottomline, the facts strongly suggest there IS an inordinate number of crab licenses.

    As far as anecdotal claims of boaters becoming entangled in gear, I also don't mind repeating, the people who placed that gear in harms way are still responsible. The people polluting the bay for profit are responsible for their pollution. People may choose to meet in the middle and merely suggest there is simply a user conflict. Unfortunately I do not see comms meeting anybody in the middle. They have repeated simple dogma that lost gear is not their fault. They place blame squarely on recreational boaters, suggesting they are entitled to put their gear anywhere, anytime. Like littering the bay with too much gear is all part of the commercial fishing entitlement. I for one will never accept this kind of entitlement. Until comms figure out a reasonable way to manage the conflict, they are responsible, period.

  10. #160
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    4,872

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt View Post
    Chris, you could have also picked on his statement about "an inordinate amount of crabbing licenses" ...numerous peer reviewed studies have concluded the States HAVE issued too many licenses.
    I have no info on that.

Page 16 of 24 FirstFirst ... 1415161718 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Link to Us   Subscription Information   Advertising Information   Terms of Service   Privacy Policy   Resources   Contact Us   About Us

©2012 TidalFish.com. All Rights Reserved.