Raw vs. Jpeg
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Raw vs. Jpeg

  1. #1
    Dedicated TF Poster - Not a Tidal Fish Subscriber
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    742

    Default Raw vs. Jpeg

    So I have a Canon T2i and have basically just been trying to teach myself how to use it and become familiar with the settings. I have been shooting everything in JPEG but have been reading about the advantages of shooting in RAW. Looking for some guidance here. My take on what I have read it sounds like if I just out shooting a kids birthday party JPEG is fine, but if I want the highest quality images with the most flexibility then RAW is the way to go. Here are a couple I shot around our jobsite and one of the NC State Capital last night.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3247.jpg 
Views:	95 
Size:	117.9 KB 
ID:	46423   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3254.jpg 
Views:	96 
Size:	105.1 KB 
ID:	46424   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3261.jpg 
Views:	92 
Size:	66.5 KB 
ID:	46425  


  2. Remove Advertisements
    TidalFish.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    New TF Poster - Not a Tidal Fish Subscriber
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Hi John-
    I am a Canon shooter as well and prefer shooting in RAW. There are advantages to both RAW and JPEG. JPEGS dont require additional processing in the computer and take up less hard drive space. They are fine for snapshots and everyday type images, but here is the rub.. everytime you open one of those images and resave it- it degrades the quality of the image.. (strike one). Shooting in jpeg, the camera makes a decision FOR YOU when it is processed about color tone/sharpness/contrast etc.(strike two) if you get the color balance wrong, or the exposure wrong you have very little leeway to fix it later in post processing (strike three)

    RAW is like having the negative of the file.. you can play/modify/crop/change color/sharpness/etc WITHOUT degrading or altering your original file.. you will always have the negative to go back to. If you blow out the highlights shooting on the water, you can recover most of them.. shadow areas too dark? you can add fill light..do your pictures have a color tint from varied lighting sources? you can easily change that... pictures look noisy because of high ISO's? easy to fix in a RAW file.

    Having said that, when I converted from JPEG to RAW shooting, I actually had my camera set to shoot RAW + JPEG for a while. I would just delete the raw files I didnt want, BUT if I had a great shot, I had the ability to fix/alter/improve it in post processing. Within a few weeks I was shooting exclusively RAW because I think I can do a better job of processing my photos than the camera can. RAW may seem like more processing work, but actually most programs are set up where you can process one photo of your batch, and apply those settings to the rest of your shots with just a keystroke, which is a great time saver.. I would suggest setting your camera to RAW + JPEG- go take some interesting shots, and some in low light, bright sunlight, and some with lots of detail... process the raw files and then compare them to the "what the camera decided jpeg shots"... I would bet money that you will shoot exclusively raw after that.

  4. #3
    Dedicated TF Poster - Not a Tidal Fish Subscriber
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    742

    Default

    I have actually been shooting in the JPEG and RAW like you are talking about. I just haven't done anything with the RAW files. What program do you use for processing?

  5. Remove Advertisements
    TidalFish.com
    Advertisements
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Link to Us   Subscription Information   Advertise   Privacy Policy   Resources   Contact Us   About Us

©2012 TidalFish.com. All Rights Reserved.