That quote doesn't support your claims at all. In that quote I don't say a moratorium makes no sense, I don't poo-poo the idea of a moratorium, and I don't say we SHOULD allow harvesting. Two pages later I wrote that "One can make a logical argument that given the state of the bay's oyster, harvests should be reduced or stopped entirely."
I'm trying here, but I don't feel like I'm getting through. The only other person who ever felt I was this wrong about everything was my ex wife.
WAIT A MINUTE... hmmmmm