Tidal Fish Forum banner
1 - 20 of 43 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
3,550 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I am posting this fyi, it is a late breaking news item from Greenwire, other media outlets will likely report it soon.


I am posting a few excerpts from the article, the full article provides additonal information.

CHESAPEAKE BAY: 7 charged with illegal catch, sale of protected fish (01/30/2009)
Greenwire

"Criminal charges were filed in federal court today against a ring of commercial fishermen and salesmen involved over five years in the illegal catch and sale of hundreds of thousands of pounds of striped bass from the Chesapeake Bay, the Justice Department said....

...Five Maryland fisherman and two employees of a Washington, D.C., fish wholesaler were charged with violating the Lacey Act through the illegal capture and sale of a protected species, the department said."

"...The Lacey Act carries a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment and a fine of up to $250,000. If found guilty, the fishermen may also have to forfeit the vessels and vehicles used to commit the offense.

The charges come as the result of an undercover investigation that the Fish and Wildlife Service and Maryland and Virginia police began in 2003. The task force bought and sold striped bass undercover and observed fishing vessels in the Chesapeake Bay and on the Potomac River.

The investigation is continuing and more charges are possible, the Justice Department said. The department charged two other Maryland fishermen in October with a seven-count felony indictment for similar conduct..."
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,641 Posts
From Southern MD Online (Eight Charged in Largest Ever Local Illegal Fishing Investigation - Southern Maryland Headline News)

Interesting.....

Posted on January 30, 2009

Two More Indicted in Illegal Commercial Fishing Operation in the Chesapeake Bay and Potomac River

WASHINGTON, Jan. 30 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Five commercial fishermen in St. Mary's County, Md., a fish wholesaler, its owner and an employee have been charged in Maryland and Washington, D.C., for their role in the illegal harvest, sale, and purchase of hundreds of thousands of pounds of striped bass from the Chesapeake Bay and Potomac River from 2003 through 2007, the Justice Department announced today.

According to the criminal informations, the individuals and corporation have been charged with violating the Lacey Act, which is a federal law that prohibits individuals or corporations from creating false records for fish or wildlife, and from transporting, selling, or buying fish and wildlife harvested illegally. Specifically, the informations allege that the commercial fishermen transported and sold striped bass, knowing that they had falsely recorded on their permit allocation cards the numbers and weight of the striped bass they caught and failed to accurately record the times when the fish were actually harvested.

Individuals charged include:
-- Thomas L. Crowder Jr. of Leonardtown, Md.
-- John W. Dean of Scotland, Md.
-- Charles Quade of Churchtown, Md.
-- Thomas L. Hallock of Catharpin, Va.
-- Keith A. Collins of Deale, Md.
-- Robert Moore Sr. of Falls Church, Va.
-- Robert Moore Jr. of Ashburn, Va.

The company charged is Cannon Seafood Inc., located in Washington, D.C., with Robert Moore Sr., as its owner.

Two additional St. Mary's County commercial fishermen were indicted in October 2008 for similar conduct. Joseph Peter Nelson and Joseph Peter Nelson, Jr., are charged in the District of Maryland in a seven count felony indictment, alleging one count of felony conspiracy to violate the Lacey Act, and six substantive felony Lacey Act counts. The indictment also seeks forfeiture of vessels and vehicles allegedly used by the Nelsons in carrying out the offenses. The indictment alleges that from September 2003 through March 2007 the defendants exceeded their quota of Maryland striped bass by failing to check in all the fish they caught and by falsely inflating the numbers of fish that they allegedly checked-in in order to secure additional Maryland tags. It also alleges that the defendants placed Maryland tags on fish that were not caught in that state's regulated waters, and placed tags on fish that falsely indicated that they were caught by hook and line when they were not. The indictment further alleges that the Nelsons engaged in a series of sales of unlawfully caught fish to undercover agents who were posing as out of state fish wholesalers.

In early spring each year, wild coastal striped bass (Morone saxatilis), known regionally as rockfish, enter the estuary or river where they were born to spawn, and then return to ocean waters to live, migrating along the coastline. Fish spawned from the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem contribute the greatest number of striped bass to the Atlantic coastal fishery, and the commercial fishery for Atlantic coastal striped bass is based primarily on migrations of fish born in the Chesapeake Bay area. Striped bass do not die after spawning. They may live up to 30 years and reach 50 pounds or more. The population of coastal Atlantic striped bass depends heavily upon the capability of older, larger, female striped bass to successfully reproduce.

Maryland regulates the commercial catch of striped bass from its waters and enforces the regulations of the Potomac River Fisheries Commission, which regulates the commercial catch of striped bass from Maryland waters located in the main stem of the Potomac River. The striped bass management and protection measures, including tagging requirements, closed seasons, size limits, and quota amounts, are focused on maintaining a target spawning stock to protect the fishery from over-fishing. Maryland also requires that all fish caught by a commercial fisherman be weighed and counted at a designated state check-in station, with the total number and total weight of the fish caught recorded on the commercial fisherman's permit allocation card and transmitted to the state of Maryland on a check station daily catch reporting sheet.

A criminal information and indictment are not a finding of guilt. An individual charged by criminal information or indictment is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.

The Lacey Act carries a maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment and a fine of up to $250,000, plus the potential forfeiture of the vessels and vehicles used in committing the offense.

The charges are a result of the investigation by an interstate task force formed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Maryland Natural Resources Police and the Virginia Marine Police, Special Investigative Unit in 2003. The task force conducted undercover purchases and sales of striped bass in 2003, engaged in covert observation of commercial fishing operations in the Chesapeake Bay and Potomac River area, and conducted detailed analysis of area striped bass catch reporting and commercial business sales records from 2003 through 2007. The investigation is continuing, and charges against others are possible.

These cases are being prosecuted by Senior Trial Attorney Wayne Hettenbach of the Justice Department's Environmental Crimes Section, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Stacy Belf of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Maryland with assistance from the U.S. Attorneys' Office for the District of Columbia.

Source: U.S. Department of Justice

Ele
 

· Registered
Joined
·
248 Posts
any probono attnys

i wonder if... we being citizens of maryland, and the fish perhaps being a resource "owned" by the citizens of maryland... can we file a civil suit against these suckers for damages or for theft ?????where do i signup?:thumbup:
 

· Tidal Fish Super Subscriber - I rock!
Joined
·
3,433 Posts
Takes alot of evidence to get a prison sentence and a 1/4 million dollar fine ..........

I for one am glad that the state boys from both states held back to raise this to a Federal case inatead of making a local arrest that ends in the good ole boy courts where they are fined a dime on a $20 fish.

From what I've seen so far, getting caught and a small fine is just a cost of doing business to these guys. Hopefully, this will raise the stakes high enough to make at least some think twice about their illegal actions in the future.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,312 Posts
Federal charges are very, very different than state charges. Federal cases being tried by federal prosecutors is far different than being tried in State courts These guys are in the big league court now, good ole boy **** is N/A. If nothing else it will cost them big bucks in attorney's fees to defend themselves. I hope they saved some money from the sale of all the illegal Rockfish they sold over the last 5 years.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,060 Posts
people who do **** like that piss me off. I cant wait to be a Maryland Natural Resources Police Officer!!! and take care of people doing this ****
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,641 Posts
According to the Baltimore Sun, it was millions of pounds, not thousands of pounds that have been stolen.

There is talk that the ASMFA may require MD to pay back these fish. I wonder if it will come from the commercial or recreation quotas.

Maybe this has something to do with the decline of the fishery the past few years.

Ele
 

· Registered
Joined
·
328 Posts
I saw a young guy at the Ocean City ramp. He could not produce a tuna permit. The officers we in the process of impounding his truck,trailer and boat. They issued a citation with the fine listed at $25,000 for the one blue fin on board.
It was a really impressive warning to everyone at the ramp.
Uncle Bob
 

· Registered
Joined
·
7,851 Posts
Federal charges are very, very different than state charges. Federal cases being tried by federal prosecutors is far different than being tried in State courts These guys are in the big league court now, good ole boy **** is N/A. If nothing else it will cost them big bucks in attorney's fees to defend themselves. I hope they saved some money from the sale of all the illegal Rockfish they sold over the last 5 years.
Agreed. Federal charges, a federal court and federal prosecutors are completely different animals, in most cases, than at the state level. I all likelihood, this is a much more serious matter than the state poaching cases.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,240 Posts
Now were talking Penalty (FELONY)

Felony charges now were are talking

In the United States felons often face additional consequences, such as the loss of voting rights in many states; exclusion from certain lines of work and difficulty in finding a job in others; prohibition from obtaining certain licenses; exclusion from purchase and possession of firearms, ammunition and body armour; and ineligibility to run for or be elected to public office. In addition, some states consider a felony conviction to be grounds for an uncontested divorce. These, among other losses of privileges not included explicitly in sentencing, are known as collateral consequences of criminal charges.
For state law convictions, expungement is determined by the law of the state. Few states do not allow expungement, regardless of the offense:eek2::eek2:

with poachers it seems they never learn their lesson the first time so do I hear STRIKE ONE
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,545 Posts
--Ok --Lers start the Betting --

--Outta the 7 who took the Plea Bargin ?--A little bird Knows --
 
1 - 20 of 43 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top