Tidal Fish Forum banner
1 - 9 of 9 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,877 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·




"Change", in this case, consists of missile deployments on the frontiers of NATO. Russian president Dmitri Medvedev announced the move yesterday in a speech that never once mentioned the new American President-elect, but caustically criticized the Western approach to Moscow. Medvedev also reversed course on missile disarmament in western Russia:
President Medvedev ordered missiles to be stationed up against Nato's borders yesterday to counter American plans to build a missile defence shield.
Speaking within hours of Barack Obama's election, Mr Medvedev announced that Russia would base Iskander missiles in its Baltic exclave of Kaliningrad - the former German city - next to the border with Poland.
He did not say whether the short-range missiles would carry nuclear warheads.
Taking advantage of the world's attention on the US elections, Mr Medvedev also cancelled plans to withdraw three intercontinental ballistic missile regiments from western Russia by 2010.
This would appear to be the first major challenge to Obama, even though he has not yet taken office. Russia carefully watched as Obama denigrated missile-defense research and deployment during the primaries, and then remained carefully silent about it in the general election. They want to see whether they can intimidate Obama into retreat, even after eastern European nations like Poland and the Czech Republic have already signed onto a partnership with the US for these missile-defense stations.
Joe Biden warned that Obama would face just such a test early in his term. He also warned that Obama's reaction would not look like smart strategy, and told Obama supporters that they would have to stick by him while Obama received massive criticism for his actions. One can interpret that in two different ways: either Obama's response would anger his supporters, or it would anger everyone else.
I'm hoping that Obama sticks to American commitments in the region. Given his comments about ending missile-defense research and deployment, I'm afraid that Obama will run away from Russia on this point, and that the first Medvedev/Putin-Obama confrontation will remind people even more of the disastrous Kennedy-Khrushchev summit in 1961 that precipitated the Berlin Wall and the Cuban Missile Crisis.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,888 Posts
I honestly believe that hill will stand up to Russia atleast on the surface. I am somewhat worried about what he will do and say behind the scenes.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,888 Posts
I guess that depends on your criteria. Being a good father, husband, son, and friend is all I ever aspired to be. As long as I've succeeded in those things I'm 100 % happy with my life. I wonder if he can say the same thing? There's nothing wrong with being a simple man.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,432 Posts
Yes, a simple man that has never known risk, but quick to question the integrity of one who clearly has. Pitiful. You call yourself a good father? This detached observer submits that your standards are pretty low.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,888 Posts
Risk? What risk is there in jumping to the winning side only to keep yourself relevant? Had he endorsed Obama from the beginning or even before his victory was clear perhaps I would feel differently. Oh and I'm not insecure enough to respond to your attempts to drag me into a childish argument.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,877 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
CG is the resident elitist leftie pompous ass.

We're all hoping he someday grows up.

Some know that "simplicity" means not having a mind full of broken glass like him.
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Top