The Post has a follow up piece that provides some more information on the striper poaching Lacey Act case--from the article:
"I believe that most of them thought that the worst they were doing was only a state violation," said Robert T. Brown, president of the watermen's association in St. Mary's County, where much of the investigation took place. "They didn't know they were going to be in a federal court, I can tell you that."
Entire article is on the following link:
Swimming in Intrigue in Backwoods of Md. - washingtonpost.com
I hope anyone considering selling yellow perch for shipmint to markets in the mid-west clearly understands that if anything about how those fish were harvested was outside the law that the transaction violates the Lacey Act because of the interstate commerce aspect. It may be time for some folks to wake up and smell the coffee--the feds play hardball and this is not rocket science!
"I believe that most of them thought that the worst they were doing was only a state violation," said Robert T. Brown, president of the watermen's association in St. Mary's County, where much of the investigation took place. "They didn't know they were going to be in a federal court, I can tell you that."
Entire article is on the following link:
Swimming in Intrigue in Backwoods of Md. - washingtonpost.com
I hope anyone considering selling yellow perch for shipmint to markets in the mid-west clearly understands that if anything about how those fish were harvested was outside the law that the transaction violates the Lacey Act because of the interstate commerce aspect. It may be time for some folks to wake up and smell the coffee--the feds play hardball and this is not rocket science!